医学
危险系数
内科学
尿酸
置信区间
肾脏疾病
医疗补助
比例危险模型
病历
队列研究
队列
社区动脉粥样硬化风险
优势比
经济增长
医疗保健
经济
作者
Andrew Kummer,Morgan E. Grams,Pamela L. Lutsey,Yu‐An Chen,Kunihiro Matsushita,Anna Köttgen,Aaron R. Folsom,Josef Coresh
摘要
Previous studies demonstrated a higher risk of CKD in persons with a history of kidney stones, but these studies examined mostly white populations and did not evaluate important potential interactions such as race and plasma uric acid.In 10,678 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants free of CKD at baseline (ARIC visit 4 in 1996-1998), we assessed the association between a history of nephrolithiasis (a time-varying variable, defined by a combination of self-report and diagnostic codes) and incident CKD (defined by diagnostic codes from linkage to hospitalizations and US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' records).At baseline, 856 participants had a history of nephrolithiasis; 322 developed nephrolithiasis during follow-up. Over a mean follow-up of 12 years, there were 1037 incident CKD events. Nephrolithiasis history was associated with a 29% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.07 to 1.54) higher risk of CKD in demographic-adjusted analyses, but the association was no longer statistically significant after multivariable adjustment (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.32). The multivariable-adjusted association was stronger among participants with plasma uric acid levels ≤6 mg/dl (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.72) compared with those with levels >6 mg/dl (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.28; P(interaction) = 0.05). There was no interaction of stone disease and race with incident CKD.In this community-based cohort, nephrolithiasis was not an independent risk factor for incident CKD overall. However, risk of CKD was unexpectedly elevated in participants with stone disease and lower plasma uric acid levels.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI