民族
地理
社会经济地位
全球城市
包裹体(矿物)
全球南方
经济增长
社会经济学
政治学
发展经济学
环境卫生
社会学
人口
医学
经济地理学
性别研究
经济
考古
法学
作者
Alessandro Rigolon,Matthew H.E.M. Browning,Kangjae Lee,Seunguk Shin
出处
期刊:Urban science
[Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute]
日期:2018-08-08
卷期号:2 (3): 67-67
被引量:198
标识
DOI:10.3390/urbansci2030067
摘要
This review examines disparities in access to urban green space (UGS) based on socioeconomic status (SES) and race-ethnicity in Global South cities. It was motivated by documented human health and ecosystem services benefits of UGS in Global South countries and UGS planning barriers in rapidly urbanizing cities. Additionally, another review of Global North UGS studies uncovered that high-SES and White people have access to a higher quantity of higher quality UGSs than low-SES and racial-ethnic minority people but that no clear differences exist regarding who lives closer to UGS. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to uncover (1) whether UGS inequities in Global North cities are evident in Global South cities and (2) whether inequities in the Global South vary between continents. Through the PRISMA approach and five inclusion criteria, we identified 46 peer-reviewed articles that measured SES or racial-ethnic disparities in access to UGS in Global South cities. We found inequities for UGS quantity (high-SES people are advantaged in 85% of cases) and UGS proximity (74% of cases). Inequities were less consistent for UGS quality (65% of cases). We also found that UGS inequities were consistent across African, Asian, and Latin American cities. These findings suggest that Global South cities experience similar inequities in UGS quantity and quality as Global North cities, but that the former also face inequities in UGS proximity.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI