隐喻
调解
代表(政治)
中国
叙述的
战斗
语言学
心理学
冠状病毒
社会学
媒体研究
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
政治学
历史
医学
法学
社会科学
哲学
疾病
考古
病理
政治
传染病(医学专业)
标识
DOI:10.1177/09579265221088122
摘要
Drawing upon a corpus approach to metaphor analysis, stance analysis, and Critical Discourse Analysis, the study analyzes different stances taken by the Chinese news outlet Global Times (GT) and the American The New York Times (NYT) in 2020 Coronavirus narratives to Chinese and English readers. The database includes all Coronavirus-related GT and NYT bilingual opinion articles in 2020, that is, 97 pairs from GT and 73 pairs from NYT which are comparable in Chinese and English tokens. Results show that the differences between GT and NYT in narrating the pandemic and the involved parties, that is, China and the US, are statistically significant with a moderate to strong effect size. The Lambda test of association demonstrates that the knowledge of metaphor transfer methods can significantly increase the correctness of attitudinal intensity prediction, which bears out metaphor transfer as a representation of stance mediation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI