医学
耳鸣
磁刺激
神经学
随机对照试验
安慰剂
麻醉
刺激
听力学
物理疗法
外科
内科学
耳鼻咽喉科
病理
替代医学
头颈外科
作者
Joanna Godbehere,Jaswinder S. Sandhu,Alexander Evans,V. Twigg,Ian Scivill,Jaydip Ray,Anthony T. Barker
出处
期刊:Otology & Neurotology
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2019-05-06
卷期号:40 (5S): S38-S42
被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1097/mao.0000000000002207
摘要
Objective: To determine whether theta burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is an effective treatment for chronic tinnitus compared with a control stimulus. Study Design: A two-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing an active treatment group to a placebo control group. Setting: Neurotology department of a tertiary referral center. Patients: Forty new and existing patients with chronic unilateral or bilateral tinnitus were recruited from specialist hearing and balance clinics. Interventions: The subjects were randomized into two groups representing the treatment and sham subcategories. Two 40 second trains, 15 minutes apart of transcranial stimulation was provided using a super rapid stimulator (2.2. Tesla, Magstim Inc., Wales, UK) using a circular delivery coil. Treatment was provided over 5 consecutive days. Main Outcome Measure: Tinnitus functional index (TFI) scores were recorded before treatment, immediately after treatment, 2 weeks, and at 4 weeks following treatment and compared. Results: TFI scores were analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and found to be normally distributed. A paired Student t test was then performed. Both the active treatment group and control group had a significant improvement in their TFI scores following treatment; however, there was no significant difference between active treatment and sham treatment groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a significant placebo effect following treatment with sham therapy and may suggest that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not have a therapeutic use in treating chronic tinnitus.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI