医学
计算机断层摄影术
肺癌
家族史
肺癌筛查
放射科
肿瘤科
作者
Chi-Liang Wang,Kuo-Hsuan Hsu,Ya‐Hsuan Chang,Chao‐Chi Ho,Chun‐Ju Chiang,Kun‐Chieh Chen,Yun‐Chung Cheung,Pei-Ching Huang,Yu‐Ruei Chen,Chih-Yi Chen,Chung‐Ping Hsu,Jiun‐Yi Hsia,Hsuan‐Yu Chen,Shi‐Yi Yang,Yao‐Jen Li,Tsung‐Ying Yang,Jeng‐Sen Tseng,Cheng-Yen Chuang,Chao A. Hsiung,Yuh‐Min Chen
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2023.06.018
摘要
BACKGROUND The role of family history of lung cancer (LCFH) in screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has not been prospectively investigated and with long-term follow-up. METHODS A multicenter prospective study with up to three rounds of annual LDCT screening was conducted to determine the detection rate of LC in asymptomatic first or second-degree relatives of LCFH. RESULTS From 2007 to 2011, there were 1,102 participants enrolled, including 805 and 297 from simplex (SF) and multiplex families (MF), respectively (54.2% female, and 70.0% never-smokers). Last follow-up date was May 05, 2021. The overall LC detection rate was 4.5% (50/1102). The detection rate in MF was 9.4% (19/202) and 4.4% (4/91) in never-smokers and who smoked, respectively. The corresponding rates for SF were 3.7% (21/569) and 2.7% (6/223), respectively. Of them, 68.0% and 22.0% of cases with stage I and IV diseases, respectively. LC diagnoses within a 3-year interval from initial screening were younger, higher detection rate, and more stage I disease; thereafter, more stage III/IV disease and 66.7% (16/24) with negative or semi-positive nodules in initial CT scans. Within the 6-year interval, only maternal (modified rate ratio [RR]=4.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.32–8.56) or maternal relative history of LC (modified RR=5.41, 95% CI=2.84–10.30) increased the risk of LC. CONCLUSION LCFH is a risk factor for LC, more in MF history, never-smokers, younger adults, and those with maternal relatives with LC. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm mortality benefit of LDCT screening in those with LCFH.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI