等电聚焦
色谱法
化学
毛细管电泳
质谱法
单克隆抗体
毛细管作用
毛细管电泳-质谱法
离子色谱法
电泳
分析化学(期刊)
抗体
电喷雾电离
材料科学
生物化学
复合材料
酶
生物
免疫学
作者
Jasmin Schairer,Alisa Höchsmann,Benedikt Bauer,Volker Höfer,Jennifer Römer,Christian Neusüß
出处
期刊:mAbs
[Informa]
日期:2025-07-31
卷期号:17 (1): 2537116-2537116
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1080/19420862.2025.2537116
摘要
Monoclonal antibody (mAb) charge variant analysis, which ensures the quality of biopharmaceuticals, is primarily performed by either cation exchange chromatography (CEX), capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF), or capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). Though selectivity is different for all methods, mAb proteoforms can be quantified on the intact level with a low risk of artifacts. Identification and characterization can be performed by mass spectrometry (MS), but coupling is hampered by the use of nonvolatile constituents. Here, we present comparative data and a thorough review of CEX-MS, CIEF-MS, and CZE-MS for the analysis of charge variants on the intact level. The separation of the proteoforms is confirmed by online UV detection with subsequent online MS coupling. Each method was tested for generic use by measuring 10 mAbs with an isoelectric point (pI) of 7.3 to 8.7 without individually adjusting the method parameters for each mAb. The methods and the identified proteoforms are compared among each other as well as to a previously published CZE-MS method on the subunit level. The lysine variant was used to compare the resolution of the different separation methods and showed a high resolving power for all separation methods tested. The different method selectivities were revealed by the monoglycosylation, which was found in the peak of the main variant with CEX and CIEF, while it was separated from the main peak with CZE. In combination with a comprehensive literature review, our results provide a complete overview of the current state of the methods with information on the advantages and limitations of each methodology.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI