Framingham risk score conventional risk factors are potent to predict all-cause mortality using machine learning algorithms: a population-based prospective cohort study over 40 years in China

弗雷明翰风险评分 机器学习 逻辑回归 接收机工作特性 置信区间 支持向量机 医学 随机森林 队列 人工智能 预测建模 前瞻性队列研究 人口 算法 队列研究 计算机科学 内科学 疾病 环境卫生
作者
Qianqian Huang,Tianshu Zeng,Jiaoyue Zhang,Jie Min,Juan Zheng,Shenghua Tian,Hantao Huang,XiaoHuan Liu,Hao Zhang,Ping Wang,Xiang Hu,Lulu Chen
出处
期刊:Journal of Investigative Medicine [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:71 (6): 586-590
标识
DOI:10.1177/10815589231169689
摘要

Predicting all-cause mortality using available or conveniently modifiable risk factors is potentially crucial in reducing deaths precisely and efficiently. Framingham risk score (FRS) is widely used in predicting cardiovascular diseases, and its conventional risk factors are closely pertinent to deaths. Machine learning is increasingly considered to improve the predicting performances by developing predictive models. We aimed to develop the all-cause mortality predictive models using five machine learning (ML) algorithms (decision trees, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), XgBoost, and logistic regression) and determine whether FRS conventional risk factors are sufficient for predicting all-cause mortality in individuals over 40 years. Our data were obtained from a 10-year population-based prospective cohort study in China, including 9143 individuals over 40 years in 2011, and 6879 individuals followed-up in 2021. The all-cause mortality prediction models were developed using five ML algorithms by introducing all features available (182 items) or FRS conventional risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of the predictive models. The AUC and 95% confidence interval of the all-cause mortality prediction models developed by FRS conventional risk factors using five ML algorithms were 0.75 (0.726–0.772), 0.78 (0.755–0.799), 0.75 (0.731–0.777), 0.77 (0.747–0.792), and 0.78 (0.754–0.798), respectively, which is close to the AUC values of models established by all features (0.79 (0.769–0.812), 0.83 (0.807–0.848), 0.78 (0.753–0.798), 0.82 (0.796–0.838), and 0.85 (0.826–0.866), respectively). Therefore, we tentatively put forward that FRS conventional risk factors were potent to predict all-cause mortality using machine learning algorithms in the population over 40 years.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
花照林完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
zy95282发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
llllllb完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
丁丁发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
失眠刺猬完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Jasper应助干净的琦采纳,获得10
5秒前
Luo发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
wch666发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
11秒前
聪明的晓蓝完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
bkagyin应助jiumi采纳,获得10
13秒前
ProfWang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
充电宝应助TTT采纳,获得10
14秒前
大个应助suzhenyue采纳,获得10
14秒前
在水一方应助HarrisonChan采纳,获得30
15秒前
happy发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
nuture发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
wlq发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
邱邱发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
藕丁完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
余伟豪发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
CipherSage应助cc321采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
三点一共发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
Contrail应助科研牛马采纳,获得10
21秒前
干净的琦发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
迷人的绮山完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
俊逸寻雪发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7753715
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9300373
关于积分的说明 20257599
捐赠科研通 7336170
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3310567
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461815
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2323629