Should Your Genes Be Subject To Patents? No, Says a New ACLU Lawsuit.

蓝图 知识产权 诉讼 普通合伙企业 商业秘密 主题(文档) 业务 政治学 公共关系 工程类 法学 计算机科学 机械工程 图书馆学
作者
Robert I. Field
出处
期刊:PubMed
链接
标识
摘要

Who, if anyone, should own the information contained in your genes? Humans have thousands of genes contained in 23 pairs of chromosomes. These genes create the blueprint for our biology and determine who we are, what we look like, and, in some cases, what diseases we will get. There is a lot at stake, both medically and financially, in deciding who owns this knowledge. The burgeoning understanding of the genetic code has spawned the field of genomics, which holds the prospect of tailoring medical care to each person’s individual makeup. This new area of medicine has the potential to save countless lives. It has already led to clinical tests to assess the risk of various serious diseases, including several forms of cancer. The success of genomics is a result of the combined efforts of university research, which has generated many of the basic discoveries, and private corporations, which have developed commercial applications. It is, in effect, a team effort that has produced breakthroughs in many areas of medicine. The tests that are available to clinicians today have flowed from the contributions of both efforts. Whereas academia and industry form the partnership that moves genetic medicine forward, their modes of operation differ quite a bit. In one important way, this difference has dramatic legal implications—the protection granted to the intellectual property that underpins their efforts, in other words, ownership rights to the genetic information involved. Academia relies on the wide dissemination of knowledge; private industry relies, to a greater extent, on the exclusive use of knowledge. Most companies that commercialize genetic technologies seek patent protection for the information on which they rely. This means that for a period of 20 years, they effectively own it. Many academic researchers, as well as some clinicians, claim that this exclusive use inhibits their ability to further advance knowledge or to fully translate discoveries into benefits for patients. These conflicting goals have created a considerable legal controversy that remains unresolved. A lawsuit filed in May by a group of plaintiffs led by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) seeks to produce greater clarity by restricting gene patent rights.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
曾炯发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
ding应助小羊羔子采纳,获得30
刚刚
1秒前
pinkman完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
魁梧的觅松完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
wanci应助邓希静采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
嘀嘀菇菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
李珂应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
5秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
HGalong应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
小小少年发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
8秒前
mingyang发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
jailbreaker完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
Lucas应助pinkman采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
滴滴哒哒发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
河道蟹发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Yangqx007发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
高分求助中
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Sport in der Antike 800
De arte gymnastica. The art of gymnastics 600
Berns Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
Stephen R. Mackinnon - Chen Hansheng: China’s Last Romantic Revolutionary (2023) 500
Sport in der Antike Hardcover – March 1, 2015 500
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2423470
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2112053
关于积分的说明 5348696
捐赠科研通 1839640
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 915754
版权声明 561258
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 489791