耐心
一致性(知识库)
投票
社会心理学
群体决策
心理学
独立性(概率论)
考试(生物学)
代理(统计)
动态不一致
经济
微观经济学
计算机科学
数学
政治学
统计
古生物学
人工智能
法学
政治
生物
作者
Laurent Denant-Boèmont,Enrico Diecidue,Olivier L’Haridon
标识
DOI:10.1007/s10683-016-9481-4
摘要
Abstract We present experimental evidence regarding individual and group decisions over time. Static and longitudinal methods are combined to test four conditions on time preferences: impatience, stationarity, age independence, and dynamic consistency. Decision making in groups should favor coordination via communication about voting intentions. We find that individuals are neither patient nor consistent, that groups are both patient and highly consistent, and that information exchange between participants helps groups converge to stable decisions. Finally we provide additional evidence showing that our results are driven by the specific role of groups and not by either repeated choices or individual preferences when choosing for other subjects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI