可读性
心理学
凝聚力(化学)
论证(复杂分析)
阅读(过程)
语言学
主题分析
抓住
计算机科学
定性研究
社会学
生物
哲学
程序设计语言
化学
有机化学
生物化学
社会科学
出处
期刊:RELC Journal
[SAGE Publishing]
日期:2021-06-14
卷期号:54 (1): 129-148
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1177/00336882211013613
摘要
The research genre has specific communicative purposes which require students to understand the tone, generic and disciplinary conventions. The present study explored the potential of thematic progression (TP) to contribute to research argument readability. TP concerns how clauses encode information and how that information is carried forward. Three major types of TP include: (a) constant TP; (b) linear TP; and (c) derived TP. Overuse of constant TP often prevents a text from developing, while linear TP better contributes to cohesion. It was hypothesized that an effective TP pattern, if present, may help graduate students better grasp the gist in research arguments. Two groups of participants, native and non-native speakers of English, were recruited to read six Introductions of varying TP patterns and conceptualize their readability. The results revealed that the TP pattern may not have strong predictive power; rather, fewer information breaks better predict readability. Regardless of TP patterns, heavy themes and rhemes may impede understanding. Static and simple themes also do not facilitate readability. The use of metadiscursive devices may facilitate readability on condition that the themes are informative. Effective lexical chains and marked themes, which signal the ties between clauses, also ease processing.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI