医学
小切口晶状体摘除术
彗差(光学)
Scheimpflug原理
眼科
眼睛畸变
显著性差异
角膜
角膜磨镶术
视力
光学
物理
内科学
作者
Lixia Sun,Hui-Ni Lin,Vishal Jhanji,Tsz Kin Ng,Rui-feng Ji,Riping Zhang
标识
DOI:10.1007/s10792-022-02367-6
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the four measurement approaches on the determination of effective optical zone (EOZ) using Scheimpflug tomography after small-incision lenticule extraction surgery in eyes with high myopia.SettingCorneal refractive surgery conducted in an eye hospital in southern China.DesignThis is a retrospective cohort study.MethodsIn total, 74 subjects were recruited. EOZ was measured at 3 months postoperatively using vertex-based (EOZV), pupil-based (EOZP), 4 mm-ring-based total corneal refraction method (EOZ4) and tangential curvature difference map method (EOZD), and their consistencies were compared. EOZs and planned optical zone (POZ) were compared and analyzed with eccentricity, ablation degree (AD) and total corneal aberrations.ResultsAt 3 months after surgery, the mean root mean square of ΔHOA, ΔComa, ΔTrefoil and ΔSA were 0.53 ± 0.27 μm, 0.36 ± 0.20 μm, 0.01 ± 0.84 μm and 0.16 ± 0.14 μm, respectively. EOZV, EOZP, EOZ4 and EOZD were 5.87 ± 0.44 mm, 5.85 ± 0.45 mm, 4.78 ± 0.40 mm and 5.29 ± 0.27 mm, respectively, which were significantly smaller than POZ 6.48 ± 0.16 mm. Bland–Altman plots showed a good consistency among the four EOZs. The difference between the EOZV and EOZP was 0.02 mm within the range of clinically acceptable difference. In addition, the eccentricity was positively correlated with ΔHOA, ΔComa and ΔSA. ConclusionsAll 4 measurement approaches demonstrated the reduction of EOZs compared to POZ. The EOZV was the closest to POZ, followed by EOZP. The ΔEOZs showed no significant difference with eccentricity, AD and corneal aberrations.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI