基因组
感染性休克
败血症
鉴定(生物学)
病菌
计算生物学
微生物学
临床微生物学
生物
重症监护医学
医学
免疫学
遗传学
基因
生态学
作者
Thorsten Brenner,Sebastian Decker,Yevhen Vainshtein,Silke Grumaz,Mehdi Manoochehri,Manuel Feißt,Andrea Seidel-Glätzer,Mathias W. Pletz,Hendrik Bracht,Marc Moritz Berger,Kristina Fuest,Manfred Blobner,Friedhelm Bach,Onnen Moerer,Timo Brandenburger,Thomas Dimski,Klaudiusz Suchodolski,Ulrike Jäkel,Jana Zischkau,Helene Häberle
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106565
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Despite limited sensitivity and specificity, blood cultures (BCs) still represent the gold standard of diagnostic care in septic patients. We aimed to overcome current diagnostic limitations by unbiased next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in plasma samples. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational, non-interventional, multicenter study (Next GeneSiS-Trial) to compare positivity rates for NGS-based identification of causative pathogens with BCs in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock. An independent expert panel (n=3) retrospectively evaluated the plausibility of NGS-based findings and the potential for anti-infective treatment adaptations based on NGS results. RESULTS: The positivity rate of NGS-based diagnostics (NGS+) for 491 septic patients was 70.5% compared to positive BCs (BC+) with 19.4% within the first three days after sepsis onset. NGS+ results were evaluated as plausible in 98.6% of cases by the expert panel. Based on the experts´ recommendations, additional knowledge of NGS-based pathogen findings would have resulted in anti-infective treatment adaptations in 32.6% of all patients. Potentially inadequately treated NGS+/blood culture negative (BC-) patients showed worse outcomes. CONCLUSION: The integration of NGS-based pathogen diagnostics in sepsis has the potential to improve patients´ outcomes as compared to a treatment strategy based on standard-of-care microbiological diagnostics alone.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI