Work from Home: The impacts on university employee’s well-being and individual work performance

工作(物理) 建筑工程 心理学 工程类 机械工程
作者
Jobe Viernes,Michael Pasco
标识
DOI:10.58870/berj.v7i1.33
摘要

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of the firms and institutions implemented work from home to continue their operations and keep the well-being of their employees. Indeed, organizations including the universities operate successfully amid the implementation of quarantine, digitalization, and limited face-to-face communication. We studied the impacts of the acceptance of work from home and well-being on individual work performance. We found that acceptance of work from home have indications of significant influences on employees' well-being and individual work performance. For the selected university employees, work from home is moderately preferred because of the cherished activities like commuting, time with friends, and the occurrence of more physical activities. The incidence of illnesses, sleep disturbance, anxiety, dissatisfaction, and loneliness were indicators of well-being concerns that influence individual work performance. Appreciation by others and the increased spirituality motivate the employees during the work from the home set-up. COVID-19 pandemic brings various issues in communication, resources, emotions, environment, financial difficulties, work-life imbalance, time management, stress, less work, and lack of access to office materials, to the employees. However, there are opportunities for better learning, better well-being, and more often family routines. Focus on work, work-life balance fit, positive attitude, less stress, and savings are benefits of working from home. University leadership, supervisors, and managers have an overview of the issues to be provided with solutions. The qualitative responses are potential research instruments to be tested for reliability. An adequate number of employees in different positions and universities to create a quantitative model is encouraged for future researchers.ReferencesAnderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., & Cochran, J. J. (2018). Modern Business Statistics with Microsoft Office Excel (6th ed.). SouthWestern/Thomson Learning.Arruda, W. (2020). Ways COVID-19 will change the workplace forever. Working from home effectiveness during Covid-19: Evidence from university staff in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27 (1), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.05.002Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Multiple levels in job demandsresources theory: Implications for employee well-being and performance. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of Well-being. DEF Publishers. https://doi.org/nobascholar.comBrown, C., Spiro, J., & Quinton, S. (2020). The role of research ethics committees: Friend or foe in educational research? An exploratory study. British Educational Research Journal, 46 (4), 747-769. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3654Cankir, B. & Sahin, S. (2018). Psychological well-being and jobperformance: The mediating role of engagement. Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi – Yıl, 11 Sayı 3, 2550-2560. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330022893_Psychological_Well-Being_and_Job_Performance_The_Mediating_Role_of_Work_EngagementCharoensukmongkol, P. & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2020). The interaction effect of crisis communication and social support on the emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Business Communication, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420953188Creswell, J.W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. DBER Speaker Series, 48, 1-54. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48Drasler, V., Bertoncelj, J., Korosec, M., Zontar, T. P., Ulrih, N. P. & Cigic, B. (2021). Difference in the attitude of students and employees of the University of Ljubljana towards work from home and online education: Lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13 (5118), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095118Evanoff, B. A., Strickland, J. R., Dale A. M., Hayibor, L., Page, E., Duncan, J. G., Kannampallil, T. & Gray, D. L. (2020). Workrelated and personal factors associated with mental well-being during the COVID-19 response: Survey of Health Care and Other Workers, 22 (8), 2-11. https://www.jmir.org/2021/4/e29069Fakis, A., Hilliam, R., Stonely, H. & Towned, M. (2014). Quantitative analysis of qualitative information from interviews: A systematic literature review. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8 (2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813495111Funder, D. C. & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202Gandy, W. M., Coberley, C., Pope, J. E., Wells, A. & Rula, E. Y. (2014). Comparing the contributions of well-being and disease status to employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000109Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and How to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203Hashim R., Bakar, A., Noh, I. & Mahyudin, H. A. (2020). Employees’ job satisfaction and performance through working from home during the pandemic lockdown. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(15), 461-467. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v5i15.2515Ipsen, C., van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., Hansen, J.P. (2021).Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. Int. J. Environ. Res. and Public Health, 18 (1826). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041826Irawanto, D. W., Novianti, K. R. & Roz, K. (2021). Work from home: Measuring satisfaction between work-life balance and work stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Economies, 9, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9030096Giovanis E. & Ozdamar O. (2021) Implications of COVID-19: the effect of working from home on financial and mental well-being in the UK. Int J Health Policy Management, 1-7. http://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.33Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet H. C. W. & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56 (3), 332-337. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113Loewenstein, G., Cain, D. M. & Sah, S. (2011). The Limits of transparency: Pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 101 (3), 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.423Mäkiniemi, J.-P., Oksanen, A. & Mäkikangas A. (2021). Loneliness and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The moderating roles of personal, social and organizational resources on perceived stress and exhaustion among Finnish University employees. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137146Mihalache, M. & Mihalache, O. R. (2021). How workplace support for the COVID-19 pandemic and personality traits affect changes in employees' affective commitment to the organization and jobrelated well-being. Human Resources Management, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22082Miller, B. (2014). Free statistics and materials by Bill Miller. https://openstat.info/OpenStatMain.htmNangoy, R., Mursitama, T. N., Setiadi, N. J. & Pradipto, Y. D. (2020). Creating sustainable performance in the fourth industrial revolution era: The effect of employee’s work well-being on job performance. Management Science Letters, 10, 1037–104. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.006Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E. & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31 (2), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463Pfaff, K. A., Baxter, P. E., Jack, S. M., & Ploeg, J. (2014). Exploring new graduate nurse confidence in interprofessional collaboration: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51 (8), 1142-1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.01.001Prasath, P. R., Bhat, C. S., Mather, P. C., Foreman, T., & James, J. K. (2021). Wellbeing, psychological capital, and coping of university employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Journal of the Professoriate, an affiliate of the Center for African American Research and Policy. ISSN 1556-7699Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., Becker, J. M. (2015). Smartpls3. Bonningstedt: SmartPLS. http://www.smartpls.comSabwami, K. M., Areba, G. N. & Abenga, N. (2020). Effect of principals’ practices of transformational leadership on the management of school financial resources in public secondary schools of Trans-Nzoia County, Kenya. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 4 (3), 101-112. http://www.jriiejournal.comSan Beda University (n.d.). San Beda University. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Beda _UniversitySchifano, S., Clark, A.E., Greiff, S., Vögele, C. & D'Ambrosio, C. (2021). Well-being and working from home during COVID-19. Information Technology & People, published ahead-of-print https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0033Song, Y., Gao, J. (2018). Does telework stress employees out? A study on working at home and subjective well-being for wage/salary workers. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 11993, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/11993/does-telework-stress-employees-out-a-study-onworking-at-home-and-subjective-well-being-for-wagesalaryworkersSubedi, D. (2016). Explanatory sequential mixed method design as the third research community of knowledge claim. American Journal of Educational Research, 4 (7), 570-577. https:// doi.org./10.12691/education-4-7-10Supranowicz, P. & Paz, M. (2014). Holistic measurement of well-being: Psychometric properties of the physical, mental and social wellbeing scales (PMSW-21) for adults. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig, 65 (3), 251-258.Warren, M. A., & Bordoloi, S. D. (2020). When COVID-19 exacerbates inequities: The path forward for generating wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 10 (3), 1-6. https://doi:10.5502/ ijw.v10i3.1357Wong, A.H.K., Cheung, J.O. and Chen, Z., (2020). Promoting effectiveness of “working from home”: findings from Hong Kong working population under COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0139Yan, R., Basheer, M. F., Irfan, M. & Naveed, R. T. (2020). Role of psychological factors in employee well-being and employee performance: An empirical evidence from Pakistan. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(5), 638-650. https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2020.1060

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
william完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
山蒲完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
势均力敌发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
谨慎芷烟发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
璇儿的完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
孤独的万恶完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
粥大爷完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
地火丢发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
zx的应助被博肖95采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
YY发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
ZW完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
细腻的天问完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
hyl-tcm完成签到 ,获得积分0
9秒前
yun完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
月亮贝完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
谢雷XIELei的应助被碎落星沉采纳,获得10
11秒前
小周不知道啊完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
舒服的西装完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
jsm5566完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
博修发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
能干戎完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
Screw发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
博肖95完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
kdfdds完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
不想说完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
照亮世界的ay完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
李腾迅完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
地火丢完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
无私的幻丝完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
lili完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
阿乐完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
wolin完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Arbitrage Theory in Discrete and Continuous Time 500
English Longitudinal Study of Ageing: Waves 0-11, 1998-2024 300
2026-2030年中國基因檢測行業市場前瞻與未來投資戰略分析報告 300
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7828721
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9353687
关于积分的说明 20574249
捐赠科研通 7421585
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3335924
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2480796
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2356366