A randomized controlled trial of amitriptyline versus gabapentin for complex regional pain syndrome type I and neuropathic pain in children

医学 加巴喷丁 神经病理性疼痛 阿米替林 随机对照试验 复杂局部疼痛综合征 麻醉 物理疗法 外科 替代医学 病理
作者
Stephen C. Brown,Bradley C. Johnston,Khush Amaria,Jessica Watkins,Fiona Campbell,Carolyne Pehora,Patricia McGrath
出处
期刊:Scandinavian Journal of Pain [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:13 (1): 156-163 被引量:82
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.05.039
摘要

Abstract Background Treatment of neuropathic pain in children is challenging, and requires a multimodal approach of pharmacologic, physical, and psychological therapies; however there is little evidence to guide practice. Amitriptyline and gabapentin are first-line drugs for treating neuropathic pain in adults, yet no studies have examined their efficacy, or compared them directly, to determine which might be better for pain relief and sleep disturbance in children. Methods After informed consent was obtained, 34 patients aged 7–18 years diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) or a neuropathic pain condition were randomly allocated to receive either amitriptyline or gabapentin. Patients were followed for 6 weeks and assessed for pain intensity, sleep quality and adverse events. We blinded study personnel, including health-care providers, participants, parents, the research coordinator and the data analyst. Patients then completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a psychosocial pain assessment with the team psychologist, within 1–3 days of the start of the trial. Results At the end of the 6-week trial, patients on both drugs had important reductions in pain, having surpassed the minimally important difference (MID) of 1. The difference between the groups however was not statistically significant. For the secondary outcomes, we found no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in sleep score or adverse events suggesting that both drugs improve sleep score to a similar degree and are equally safe. Conclusions Amitriptyline and gabapentin significantly decreased pain intensity scores and improved sleep. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effects on pain reduction or sleep disability. Implications Although larger, multi-centred trials are needed to confirm our findings, including longterm follow-up, both drugs appear to be safe and effective in treating paediatric patients in the first-line treatment of CRPS I and neuropathic pain over 6-weeks.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
2秒前
周一一发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
邬紫依完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
爆米花应助LH采纳,获得10
2秒前
小蚂蚁完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助栗子采纳,获得10
3秒前
司空悒完成签到,获得积分0
3秒前
liuyu0209完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
冷艳的火龙果完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
yyyyyyy完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
蒋杰应助Rampant采纳,获得10
6秒前
嘿嘿发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
可靠的老鼠完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
淡然如风完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
愉快的芒果完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Gabriel发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
小猴完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
周一一完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
自然的南露完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
yyyyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
QC发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
polarisier发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
juan发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
完美世界应助嗯嗯嗯嗯嗯采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
Havoc发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
爱吃泡芙完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
小青椒应助科研通管家采纳,获得100
19秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Bandwidth Choice for Bias Estimators in Dynamic Nonlinear Panel Models 2000
HIGH DYNAMIC RANGE CMOS IMAGE SENSORS FOR LOW LIGHT APPLICATIONS 1500
茶艺师试题库(初级、中级、高级、技师、高级技师) 1000
Constitutional and Administrative Law 1000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 560
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5361404
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4491627
关于积分的说明 13983260
捐赠科研通 4394439
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2413970
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1406810
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1381360