A randomized controlled trial of amitriptyline versus gabapentin for complex regional pain syndrome type I and neuropathic pain in children

医学 加巴喷丁 神经病理性疼痛 阿米替林 随机对照试验 复杂局部疼痛综合征 麻醉 物理疗法 外科 替代医学 病理
作者
Stephen C. Brown,Bradley C. Johnston,Khush Amaria,Jessica Watkins,Fiona Campbell,Carolyne Pehora,Patricia McGrath
出处
期刊:Scandinavian Journal of Pain [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:13 (1): 156-163 被引量:83
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.05.039
摘要

BACKGROUND: Treatment of neuropathic pain in children is challenging, and requires a multimodal approach of pharmacologic, physical, and psychological therapies; however there is little evidence to guide practice. Amitriptyline and gabapentin are first-line drugs for treating neuropathic pain in adults, yet no studies have examined their efficacy, or compared them directly, to determine which might be better for pain relief and sleep disturbance in children. METHODS: After informed consent was obtained, 34 patients aged 7-18 years diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) or a neuropathic pain condition were randomly allocated to receive either amitriptyline or gabapentin. Patients were followed for 6 weeks and assessed for pain intensity, sleep quality and adverse events. We blinded study personnel, including health-care providers, participants, parents, the research coordinator and the data analyst. Patients then completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a psychosocial pain assessment with the team psychologist, within 1-3 days of the start of the trial. RESULTS: At the end of the 6-week trial, patients on both drugs had important reductions in pain, having surpassed the minimally important difference (MID) of 1. The difference between the groups however was not statistically significant. For the secondary outcomes, we found no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in sleep score or adverse events suggesting that both drugs improve sleep score to a similar degree and are equally safe. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline and gabapentin significantly decreased pain intensity scores and improved sleep. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effects on pain reduction or sleep disability. IMPLICATIONS: Although larger, multi-centred trials are needed to confirm our findings, including long-term follow-up, both drugs appear to be safe and effective in treating paediatric patients in the first-line treatment of CRPS I and neuropathic pain over 6-weeks.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
万能图书馆应助123采纳,获得50
刚刚
淡然又菡发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
zmn0419完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
elva完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
扣子小姐完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
酷酷的静芙完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
搞怪莫茗发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
MYLCX完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
苹果冰蓝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
科目三应助XING采纳,获得10
4秒前
万花谷完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
童心发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
胡慧婷完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Ava应助lmy采纳,获得30
6秒前
6秒前
Lucas应助研友_ZzrWKZ采纳,获得10
7秒前
CipherSage应助cindy采纳,获得10
7秒前
幸运Q完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
九月完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
南墙杀手发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
无花果应助Angie采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
薛小飞发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
花花完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
Beauty发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
dididada完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
A Case Study on Hotels as Noncongregate Emergency Living Accommodations for Returning Citizens 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7756867
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9303333
关于积分的说明 20273662
捐赠科研通 7340345
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3311642
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462540
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2325267