亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

A randomized controlled trial of amitriptyline versus gabapentin for complex regional pain syndrome type I and neuropathic pain in children

医学 加巴喷丁 神经病理性疼痛 阿米替林 随机对照试验 复杂局部疼痛综合征 麻醉 物理疗法 外科 替代医学 病理
作者
Stephen C. Brown,Bradley C. Johnston,Khush Amaria,Jessica Watkins,Fiona Campbell,Carolyne Pehora,Patricia McGrath
出处
期刊:Scandinavian Journal of Pain [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:13 (1): 156-163 被引量:83
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.05.039
摘要

BACKGROUND: Treatment of neuropathic pain in children is challenging, and requires a multimodal approach of pharmacologic, physical, and psychological therapies; however there is little evidence to guide practice. Amitriptyline and gabapentin are first-line drugs for treating neuropathic pain in adults, yet no studies have examined their efficacy, or compared them directly, to determine which might be better for pain relief and sleep disturbance in children. METHODS: After informed consent was obtained, 34 patients aged 7-18 years diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) or a neuropathic pain condition were randomly allocated to receive either amitriptyline or gabapentin. Patients were followed for 6 weeks and assessed for pain intensity, sleep quality and adverse events. We blinded study personnel, including health-care providers, participants, parents, the research coordinator and the data analyst. Patients then completed quantitative sensory testing (QST) and a psychosocial pain assessment with the team psychologist, within 1-3 days of the start of the trial. RESULTS: At the end of the 6-week trial, patients on both drugs had important reductions in pain, having surpassed the minimally important difference (MID) of 1. The difference between the groups however was not statistically significant. For the secondary outcomes, we found no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in sleep score or adverse events suggesting that both drugs improve sleep score to a similar degree and are equally safe. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline and gabapentin significantly decreased pain intensity scores and improved sleep. There were no significant differences between the two drugs in their effects on pain reduction or sleep disability. IMPLICATIONS: Although larger, multi-centred trials are needed to confirm our findings, including long-term follow-up, both drugs appear to be safe and effective in treating paediatric patients in the first-line treatment of CRPS I and neuropathic pain over 6-weeks.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
Ning00000完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
Yini发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
小透明发布了新的文献求助50
6秒前
浮游应助xyx采纳,获得10
9秒前
小壳儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
21秒前
吴大王发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
共享精神应助吴大王采纳,获得10
39秒前
48秒前
Sandy完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
吴大王发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
Lucas应助吴大王采纳,获得10
1分钟前
白bai完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Jason完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
yang发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
Jason发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
爆米花应助deity233采纳,获得10
1分钟前
jiyuan发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研粑粑关注了科研通微信公众号
1分钟前
1分钟前
Lucas应助Jason采纳,获得10
1分钟前
ini发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
deity233发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
yang完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
司空海亦发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
科研粑粑发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
朱文韬发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
乔凌云发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
高分求助中
液晶指向矢仿真分析数据集 8888
GL 2 A method for assessing the in-place cleanability of food processing equipment, Fourth Edition, December 2023 3000
Ideology and Meaning-Making under the Putin Regime 750
Annie Ernaux: De la perte au corps glorieux 600
Petrology and Plate Tectonics 500
Writing Systems 500
A Handbook of User Experience Research & Design in Libraries 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6849882
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8556346
关于积分的说明 18198621
捐赠科研通 6206950
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3043509
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2037806
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2020930