Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB–C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

医学 易普利姆玛 无容量 内科学 肿瘤科 佐剂 黑色素瘤 阶段(地层学) 随机对照试验 癌症 免疫疗法 生物 古生物学 癌症研究
作者
Paolo A. Ascierto,Michele Del Vecchio,Mario Mandalà,Helen Gogas,Ana Arance,Stéphane Dalle,C. Lance Cowey,Michael Schenker,Jean Jacques Grob,Vanna Chiarion-Sileni,Iván Márquez-Rodas,Marcus O. Butler,Michele Maio,Mark R. Middleton,Luis de la Cruz-Merino,Petr Arenberger,Victoria Atkinson,Andrew Hill,Leslie A. Fecher,Michael Millward,Nikhil I. Khushalani,Paola Queirolo,Maurice Lobo,Veerle de Pril,John T. Loffredo,James Larkin,Jeffrey S. Weber
出处
期刊:Lancet Oncology [Elsevier]
卷期号:21 (11): 1465-1477 被引量:275
标识
DOI:10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30494-0
摘要

Background Previously, findings from CheckMate 238, a double-blind, phase 3 adjuvant trial in patients with resected stage IIIB–C or stage IV melanoma, showed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival with nivolumab versus ipilimumab. This report provides updated 4-year efficacy, initial overall survival, and late-emergent safety results. Methods This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in 130 academic centres, community hospitals, and cancer centres across 25 countries. Patients aged 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB–C or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nivolumab or ipilimumab via an interactive voice response system and stratified according to disease stage and baseline PD-L1 status of tumour cells. Patients received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or intravenous ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, and then every 12 weeks until 1 year of treatment, disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival by investigator assessment, and overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety analysis. The results presented in this report reflect the 4-year update of the ongoing study with a database lock date of Jan 30, 2020. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02388906. Findings Between March 30 and Nov 30, 2015, 906 patients were assigned to nivolumab (n=453) or ipilimumab (n=453). Median follow-up was 51·1 months (IQR 41·6–52·7) with nivolumab and 50·9 months (36·2–52·3) with ipilimumab; 4-year recurrence-free survival was 51·7% (95% CI 46·8–56·3) in the nivolumab group and 41·2% (36·4–45·9) in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·60–0·86]; p=0·0003). With 211 (100 [22%] of 453 patients in the nivolumab group and 111 [25%] of 453 patients in the ipilimumab group) of 302 anticipated deaths observed (about 73% of the originally planned 88% power needed for significance), 4-year overall survival was 77·9% (95% CI 73·7–81·5) with nivolumab and 76·6% (72·2–80·3) with ipilimumab (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·66–1·14]; p=0·31). Late-emergent grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in three (1%) of 452 and seven (2%) of 453 patients. The most common late-emergent treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported were diarrhoea, diabetic ketoacidosis, and pneumonitis (one patient each) in the nivolumab group, and colitis (two patients) in the ipilimumab group. Two previously reported treatment-related deaths in the ipilimumab group were attributed to study drug toxicity (marrow aplasia in one patient and colitis in one patient); no further treatment-related deaths were reported. Interpretation At a minimum of 4 years' follow-up, nivolumab demonstrated sustained recurrence-free survival benefit versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB–C or IV melanoma indicating a long-term treatment benefit with nivolumab. With fewer deaths than anticipated, overall survival was similar in both groups. Nivolumab remains an efficacious adjuvant treatment for patients with resected high-risk melanoma, with a safety profile that is more tolerable than that of ipilimumab. Funding Bristol Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical. Previously, findings from CheckMate 238, a double-blind, phase 3 adjuvant trial in patients with resected stage IIIB–C or stage IV melanoma, showed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival with nivolumab versus ipilimumab. This report provides updated 4-year efficacy, initial overall survival, and late-emergent safety results. This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in 130 academic centres, community hospitals, and cancer centres across 25 countries. Patients aged 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB–C or IV melanoma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nivolumab or ipilimumab via an interactive voice response system and stratified according to disease stage and baseline PD-L1 status of tumour cells. Patients received intravenous nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or intravenous ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, and then every 12 weeks until 1 year of treatment, disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival by investigator assessment, and overall survival was a key secondary endpoint. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). All patients who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in the safety analysis. The results presented in this report reflect the 4-year update of the ongoing study with a database lock date of Jan 30, 2020. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02388906. Between March 30 and Nov 30, 2015, 906 patients were assigned to nivolumab (n=453) or ipilimumab (n=453). Median follow-up was 51·1 months (IQR 41·6–52·7) with nivolumab and 50·9 months (36·2–52·3) with ipilimumab; 4-year recurrence-free survival was 51·7% (95% CI 46·8–56·3) in the nivolumab group and 41·2% (36·4–45·9) in the ipilimumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·60–0·86]; p=0·0003). With 211 (100 [22%] of 453 patients in the nivolumab group and 111 [25%] of 453 patients in the ipilimumab group) of 302 anticipated deaths observed (about 73% of the originally planned 88% power needed for significance), 4-year overall survival was 77·9% (95% CI 73·7–81·5) with nivolumab and 76·6% (72·2–80·3) with ipilimumab (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·66–1·14]; p=0·31). Late-emergent grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in three (1%) of 452 and seven (2%) of 453 patients. The most common late-emergent treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported were diarrhoea, diabetic ketoacidosis, and pneumonitis (one patient each) in the nivolumab group, and colitis (two patients) in the ipilimumab group. Two previously reported treatment-related deaths in the ipilimumab group were attributed to study drug toxicity (marrow aplasia in one patient and colitis in one patient); no further treatment-related deaths were reported. At a minimum of 4 years' follow-up, nivolumab demonstrated sustained recurrence-free survival benefit versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB–C or IV melanoma indicating a long-term treatment benefit with nivolumab. With fewer deaths than anticipated, overall survival was similar in both groups. Nivolumab remains an efficacious adjuvant treatment for patients with resected high-risk melanoma, with a safety profile that is more tolerable than that of ipilimumab.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
建议保存本图,每天支付宝扫一扫(相册选取)领红包
实时播报
幽默的谷梦完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
yyj发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
宪哥他哥发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
cctv18应助无私的孤风采纳,获得10
5秒前
喵叽完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
小小况完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
钟琴发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
一颗西红柿完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
赘婿应助任我行采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
阿千发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
块块发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
卷里偷牲发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
王子完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
Lucas应助92567采纳,获得30
16秒前
阔达映之完成签到 ,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
xhy完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
无情莆发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
abc发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
香蕉觅云应助卷里偷牲采纳,获得10
22秒前
个性的紫菜应助啊懂采纳,获得20
23秒前
标致惋庭发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
欣喜忻完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
认真思真发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
猪在天上飞完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
富马酸小小完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Blancheiir完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
阿千完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Ceciliaguo完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
高分求助中
Bioinspired Catalysis with Biomimetic Clusters 1000
Work hardening in tension and fatigue : proceedings of a symposium, Cincinnati, Ohio, November 11, 1975 1000
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
The Instrument Operations and Calibration System for TerraSAR-X 800
Lexique et typologie des poteries: pour la normalisation de la description des poteries (Full Book) 400
Sustainable Land Management: Strategies to Cope with the Marginalisation of Agriculture 400
Transformerboard III 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2350861
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2056941
关于积分的说明 5124240
捐赠科研通 1787459
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 892820
版权声明 557070
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 476294