Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

置信区间 荟萃分析 可靠性(半导体) 判别效度 比例(比率) 统计 医学 心理测量学 内部一致性 数学 内科学 功率(物理) 物理 量子力学
作者
Paul S. Myles,Mark Shulman,Jennifer Reilly,Jessica Kasza,Lorena Romero
出处
期刊:BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:128 (6): 1029-1039 被引量:62
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009
摘要

There are very few patient-centred global outcome measures of recovery in the days or weeks after surgery. This meta-analysis evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical acceptability of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale.We searched bibliographic databases for studies undertaking psychometric evaluation of the QoR-15 or using the QoR-15 as an outcome measure after surgery. Record screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were independently done by two researchers. Weighted averages estimating overall summary statistics across all the studies were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled correlation coefficients were transformed using a Fisher z-transformation and then back-transformed to calculate pooled results. The four co-primary endpoints were validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility of the QoR-15 scale.A total of 26 unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding up to 22 847 patients across 16 countries, in 15 languages. A further 172 studies in a further 18 countries and six languages used the QoR-15 as an outcome measure. The QoR-15 had excellent discriminant validity, with the mean difference in QoR-15 scores in patients with and without postoperative complications (9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-13.3; P<0.001), and good convergent validity (for a global visual analogue recovery scale, pooled r=0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71). There was excellent reliability: internal consistency (pooled α=0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.87), split-half reliability=0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84), and test-retest reliability=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). There was also high responsiveness (pooled standardised response mean=0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08), patient recruitment into evaluation studies (96%; 95% CI, 93-99), and excellent completion and return rates (91%; 95% CI, 84-96). The mean time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.2-3.1) min.The QoR-15 is a valid, reliable, and responsive patient-centred outcome metric in surgical patients. It is highly acceptable to both patients and clinicians.Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Drwang完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
哈哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
yanjiusheng完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
十块小子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小马甲应助Jiayou Zhang采纳,获得10
8秒前
甜甜谷波完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
mslg33发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
吾系渣渣辉完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
smile发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
粗暴的大门完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
13秒前
科研小能手完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
共享精神应助呃呃采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Cherish应助科研小菜鸟i采纳,获得10
21秒前
南航学术混子完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
Jiayou Zhang发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
菜鸟队长完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
梦在彼岸完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
万能图书馆应助科研笑川采纳,获得10
26秒前
smile完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
茗姜发布了新的文献求助30
28秒前
Hello应助Master采纳,获得10
28秒前
研友_ZGAeoL完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
33秒前
35秒前
Ac完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
37秒前
酷波er应助NO0809采纳,获得10
37秒前
39秒前
39秒前
Master发布了新的文献求助10
39秒前
Ac发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Technologies supporting mass customization of apparel: A pilot project 450
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 360
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
Political Ideologies Their Origins and Impact 13th Edition 260
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3781213
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3326680
关于积分的说明 10228052
捐赠科研通 3041768
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1669591
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 799104
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758751