Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

置信区间 荟萃分析 可靠性(半导体) 判别效度 比例(比率) 统计 医学 心理测量学 内部一致性 数学 内科学 量子力学 物理 功率(物理)
作者
Paul S. Myles,Mark Shulman,Jennifer Reilly,Jessica Kasza,Lorena Romero
出处
期刊:BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:128 (6): 1029-1039 被引量:181
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009
摘要

There are very few patient-centred global outcome measures of recovery in the days or weeks after surgery. This meta-analysis evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical acceptability of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale.We searched bibliographic databases for studies undertaking psychometric evaluation of the QoR-15 or using the QoR-15 as an outcome measure after surgery. Record screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were independently done by two researchers. Weighted averages estimating overall summary statistics across all the studies were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled correlation coefficients were transformed using a Fisher z-transformation and then back-transformed to calculate pooled results. The four co-primary endpoints were validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility of the QoR-15 scale.A total of 26 unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding up to 22 847 patients across 16 countries, in 15 languages. A further 172 studies in a further 18 countries and six languages used the QoR-15 as an outcome measure. The QoR-15 had excellent discriminant validity, with the mean difference in QoR-15 scores in patients with and without postoperative complications (9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-13.3; P<0.001), and good convergent validity (for a global visual analogue recovery scale, pooled r=0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71). There was excellent reliability: internal consistency (pooled α=0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.87), split-half reliability=0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84), and test-retest reliability=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). There was also high responsiveness (pooled standardised response mean=0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08), patient recruitment into evaluation studies (96%; 95% CI, 93-99), and excellent completion and return rates (91%; 95% CI, 84-96). The mean time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.2-3.1) min.The QoR-15 is a valid, reliable, and responsive patient-centred outcome metric in surgical patients. It is highly acceptable to both patients and clinicians.Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
orixero的应助被不上课不行采纳,获得10
1秒前
范慧晨完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
爆米花的应助被Aan采纳,获得10
3秒前
沉静毛豆完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
4秒前
隐形曼青的应助被1090采纳,获得10
4秒前
踏实的珩完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
兰战非完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
大水发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
沉静毛豆发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
9秒前
美好黑猫完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
KKK的科研完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
半兰发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
yscr发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
刘清梅发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
含糊的幻丝完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
zpzp发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
范德萨完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
英勇羿发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
国靖发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
雪白萤完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
耍酷的小刺猬完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
JamesPei的应助被12采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
MchemG的应助被John采纳,获得30
22秒前
Nole的应助被Morua采纳,获得10
23秒前
小蘑菇的应助被傻子与白痴采纳,获得10
23秒前
23秒前
Lij发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
instill发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
英勇羿完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
千瓦尔塔发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
A Will for the Machine: Computerization, Automation, and the Arts in South Africa 400
Decentring Leadership 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7808482
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9340932
关于积分的说明 20504440
捐赠科研通 7400789
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3328838
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2475566
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2347226