医学
烧蚀
心脏病学
QRS波群
内科学
心室
心室流出道
导管消融
射频消融术
作者
Youmei Shen,Lei Wang,Ning Chen,Linlin Wang,Yajun Wang,Qian Pan,Lei Li,Xiangwei Ding,Zhoushan Gu,Fei Li,Weizhu Ju,Mingfang Li,Hongwu Chen,Gang Yang,Kai Gu,Hailei Liu,Minglong Chen
摘要
ABSTRACT Background Discrete prepotentials (DPPs) mapped inside aortic sinuses of Valsalva (ASVs) are deemed as reliable targets for ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Nevertheless, ablation may still fail, necessitating further investigation. This study aimed to investigate the electrophysiological features and ablation approaches for PVCs with failed ablation inside ASVs, despite identified DPPs. Methods and Results Patients undergoing PVCs ablation requiring left ventricular outflow tract mapping were consecutively enrolled at six centers. Inclusion criteria comprised the presence of reproducible DPPs in ASVs and the earliest activation inside ASVs preceding the left ventricle. Patients were divided into ASV and non‐ASV groups based on ablation outcomes within ASVs. Of 780 assessed patients, 40 (age 47.5 ± 19.4; 17 males) were included in the final analysis, with 10 in the non‐ASV group. The interval from DPPs to QRS onset (DPP‐QRS) in the ASV group significantly exceeded that in the non‐ASV group (44.3 ± 6.7 ms vs. 15.0 ± 5.0 ms, p < 0.001). A DPP‐QRS interval < 25 ms perfectly differentiated non‐ASV from ASV cases. Successful ablation beneath ASVs was achieved in all non‐ASV patients, despite the local potential preceding the QRS onset by only 2.3 ± 8.0 ms. In the non‐ASV group, the distance between locations of targets and DPPs was 13.3 ± 4.2 mm, negatively correlated with the DPP‐QRS interval ( R 2 = 0.618, p = 0.007). Over a 22‐month follow‐up, one patient in the non‐ASV group had recurrence. Conclusion DPPs mapped inside ASVs, despite being the earliest sites, do not necessarily represent PVCs targets. An infra‐valvular approach is suggested with a DPP‐QRS interval < 25 ms.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI