医学
复苏
优势比
输血
红细胞
钝伤
损伤严重程度评分
输血疗法
回顾性队列研究
急诊医学
紧急医疗服务
堆积红细胞
红细胞输注
麻醉
内科学
外科
毒物控制
伤害预防
作者
Harriet Tucker,Karim Brohi,Joachim Tan,Christopher Aylwin,Roger Bloomer,Rebecca Cardigan,Ross Davenport,Edward D. Davies,Phillip Godfrey,Rachel Hawes,Richard Lyon,Josephine McCullagh,Simon Stanworth,Julian Thompson,James Uprichard,Simon Walsh,Anne Weaver,Laura Green
出处
期刊:Critical Care
[BioMed Central]
日期:2023-01-17
卷期号:27 (1)
被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13054-022-04279-4
摘要
Abstract Background In-hospital acute resuscitation in trauma has evolved toward early and balanced transfusion resuscitation with red blood cells (RBC) and plasma being transfused in equal ratios. Being able to deliver this ratio in prehospital environments is a challenge. A combined component, like leukocyte-depleted red cell and plasma (RCP), could facilitate early prehospital resuscitation with RBC and plasma, while at the same time improving logistics for the team. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical benefits of RCP. Objective To compare prehospital transfusion of combined RCP versus RBC alone or RBC and plasma separately (RBC + P) on mortality in trauma bleeding patients. Methods Data were collected prospectively on patients who received prehospital transfusion (RBC + thawed plasma/Lyoplas or RCP) for traumatic hemorrhage from six prehospital services in England (2018–2020). Retrospective data on patients who transfused RBC from 2015 to 2018 were included for comparison. The association between transfusion arms and 24-h and 30-day mortality, adjusting for age, injury mechanism, age, prehospital heart rate and blood pressure, was evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results Out of 970 recruited patients, 909 fulfilled the study criteria (RBC + P = 391, RCP = 295, RBC = 223). RBC + P patients were older (mean age 42 vs 35 years for RCP and RBC), and 80% had a blunt injury (RCP = 52%, RBC = 56%). RCP and RBC + P were associated with lower odds of death at 24-h, compared to RBC alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.69 [95%CI: 0.52; 0.92] and 0.60 [95%CI: 0.32; 1.13], respectively). The lower odds of death for RBC + P and RCP vs RBC were driven by penetrating injury (aOR 0.22 [95%CI: 0.10; 0.53] and 0.39 [95%CI: 0.20; 0.76], respectively). There was no association between RCP or RBC + P with 30-day survival vs RBC. Conclusion Prehospital plasma transfusion for penetrating injury was associated with lower odds of death at 24-h compared to RBC alone. Large trials are needed to confirm these findings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI