B-059 Development and Validation of Multiplex Quantitative Allergy Tests based on Automated Flow Fluorescence Immunoassay Analyzer

Abstract Background Serological allergy tests measuring allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) are simpler and safer than skin prick tests, and the results are not influenced by skin condition or human factors. Quantitative detection of sIgE can also aid in evaluating patient allergies and aiding subsequent treatment. Dymind has researched and developed novel quantitative allergy tests based on the automated flow fluorescence immunoassay analyzer system (MF1280), enabling quantitative detection of multiple sIgE in just one test with one sample. Here, we present the performance of tIgE and two specific IgE test kits using the Dymind MF1280 system. Methods This study evaluated the performance of total IgE (tIgE) and two allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) panels of inhalant and food allergens, inhalant allergen panel including d1 (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), d2 (Dermatophagoides farina), i6 (Cockroach), e1 (Cat epithelium), e5 (Dog epithelium), w1(Common ragweed), and food allergen panel including f1 (Egg white), f2 (Cow’s milk), f3 (cod), f23 (Crab), 24 (Shrimp), and f27 (beef). Evaluation criteria included precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and method comparison. As clinical performance of 425 clinical samples collected from 2 hospital laboratory in China was evaluated by both of Dymind allergen IgE MF1280 system and Phadia ImmunoCAP. Results The validated linearity of total IgE and sIgE were 2.0-5000.0 IU/mL and 0.1-100.0 IU/mL respectively. The LOD of total IgE and sIgE determined to be 2 IU/mL and 0.1 IU/mL respectively. The precision was evaluated by assaying a low and a high samples of every sIgE assay and the result of d1, d2, i6, e1, e5, w1, f1, f2, f3, f23, f24, f27 were 3.73% / 1.34% (low sample / high sample), 3.26% / 1.95%, 2.18% / 0.87%, 1.31% / 1.40%, 3.63% / 1.13%, 2.84% / 4.76%, 4.50% / 1.53%, 5.97% / 1.64%, 3.46% / 1.11%, 1.58% / 1.73%, 3.77% / 1.28%, 1.78% / 0.96% respectively. The total mean coefficient of measurements was below 7% to ensure high precision in multiplex quantitative analysis. Method comparison of 425 clinical samples between Phadia ImmunoCAP and Dymind allergen IgE showed total concordance rate was over 85% except f2 (over 80%). Conclusions The Dymind Allergen-specific IgE test kits on the automated flow fluorescence immunoassay analyzer system provide fast and accurate in vitro diagnostic detection of tIgE and sIgE for aiding diagnostics specific allergens sensitization and treatment for allergy patients, with good precision and excellent agreement compared to ImmunoCAP. The MF1280 system has advantages including random access, fully automated, multiplex quantitative detection of allergen sIgE with reducing assay time, sample consumption and lower costs.