Effect of Pulsed-Field and Radiofrequency Ablation on Heterogeneous Ventricular Scar in a Swine Model of Healed Myocardial Infarction

Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy with higher selectivity to myocardial tissue in comparison to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We compared the effects of PFA and RFA on heterogeneous ventricular scar in a swine model of healed infarction. Methods: In 9 swine, myocardial infarction was created by balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery. After a survival period of 8 to 10 weeks, ablation with PFA or RFA was performed at infarct border zones identified by abnormal electrograms. In the PFA group (4 swine), ablation was performed with a lattice catheter (Sphere-9, Affera, Inc). In the RFA group (5 swine), ablation was performed using a 3.5-mm tip catheter (Thermocool ST-SF; Biosense Webster). To further investigate the effect of RFA on temperature development in scar tissue, intramyocardial temperature was measured in healthy and infarcted myocardium using an ex vivo bath model. Results: A total of 11 PFA and 15 RFA lesions were created at infarct border zones with heterogeneous scar. PFA produced uniform and well-demarcated lesions exhibiting irreversible injury characterized by cardiomyocyte death, contraction bands, and lymphocytic infiltration. This effect of PFA extended from the subendocardium through collagen and fat to the epicardial layers. In contrast, the effect of RFA is less uniform and largely limited to the subendocardium with minimal effect on viable myocardium deeper to separating layers of collagen and fat. PFA produced deeper and more transmural lesions (6.4 [interquartile range, 5.5–7.5) versus 5.4 [interquartile range, 4.8–5.9]), 72% versus 30%, respectively; P ≤0.02 for each comparison). The limited effect of RFA on viable myocardium at deeper infarct layers was related to a lower intramyocardial maximal temperature compared with healthy myocardium ( P =0.01). Conclusions: PFA may be advantageous for ablation in ventricular scar, producing lesions that unlike RFA are not limited to the subendocardium, but also eliminate viable myocardium separated from the catheter by collagen and fat.