沟通技巧
医学教育
干预(咨询)
心理学
梅德林
模拟病人
病人护理
医学
客观结构化临床检查
健康传播
知识管理
计算机科学
沟通技能培训
药品
患者安全
能力(人力资源)
医学知识
医疗保健
应用心理学
作者
Kannan Sridharan,Reginald P. Sequeira
摘要
Abstract Aims This study compared three artificial intelligence (AI) platforms' potential to identify drug therapy communication competencies expected of a graduating medical doctor. Methods We presented three AI platforms, namely, Poe Assistant©, ChatGPT© and Google Bard©, with structured queries to generate communication skill competencies and case scenarios appropriate for graduating medical doctors. These case scenarios comprised 15 prototypical medical conditions that required drug prescriptions. Two authors independently evaluated the AI‐enhanced clinical encounters, which integrated a diverse range of information to create patient‐centred care plans. Through a consensus‐based approach using a checklist, the communication components generated for each scenario were assessed. The instructions and warnings provided for each case scenario were evaluated by referencing the British National Formulary. Results AI platforms demonstrated overlap in competency domains generated, albeit with variations in wording. The domains of knowledge (basic and clinical pharmacology, prescribing, communication and drug safety) were unanimously recognized by all platforms. A broad consensus among Poe Assistant© and ChatGPT© on drug therapy‐related communication issues specific to each case scenario was evident. The consensus primarily encompassed salutation, generic drug prescribed, treatment goals and follow‐up schedules. Differences were observed in patient instruction clarity, listed side effects, warnings and patient empowerment. Google Bard did not provide guidance on patient communication issues. Conclusions AI platforms recognized competencies with variations in how these were stated. Poe Assistant© and ChatGPT© exhibited alignment of communication issues. However, significant discrepancies were observed in specific skill components, indicating the necessity of human intervention to critically evaluate AI‐generated outputs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI