Are Spot Test Multiple Choice Questions Easier to Answer than Short Answer Questions?

作者
Tracey Wilkinson,Hannah Shaw
出处
期刊:The FASEB Journal [Wiley]
卷期号:29 (S1) 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.344.1
摘要

Machine marked multiple choice assessments are often preferred over those requiring manual marking, with most medical schools and boards using multiple choice questions (MCQs), usually single best answer, as the main format for written tests. While these often give excellent reliability and validity, disadvantages are that students can guess the answers with no penalty, or can rely on recognition rather than having to produce information. In order to investigate whether this makes tests easier for students, 277 first year medical students were randomly allocated into two groups (A and B). Both groups wrote a formative spot test, delivered by PowerPoint. The questions were largely anatomical, but with a few other basic science questions included. The test was composed of both MCQ and short answer question (SAQ) format questions. Each group answered 40 questions in total, with 20 of each type, but the 20 questions that Group A answered in MCQ format were given to Group B as SAQs and vice versa. A Student t test was carried out to determine if there was a difference between the mean scores achieved for the two types of questions in each format. The mean SAQ score (with no half marks awarded) was 34.3% (±14.8), while that for the MCQs was 54.7% (±15.6). If half marks were included in the scores attained for the SAQs, the mean score was 37.0% (±14.9). There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between the SAQ and MCQ scores, regardless of whether half marks were included. It is therefore suggested that MCQs alone should not be relied upon, at least for spot tests, as scores achieved with MCQs are significantly higher than for SAQs. Free written response type questions should also be included.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
monica完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
better发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
汉堡包的应助被研友_LXOBO8采纳,获得10
2秒前
沙洲完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
司忆完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
null的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得20
4秒前
俞志远的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
俞志远的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
顾矜的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
cc的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
ding的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
null的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
李爱国的应助被馥桉樊采纳,获得10
5秒前
所所的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
null的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
领导范儿的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
打打的应助被执着不二采纳,获得10
5秒前
诸葛明明的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
mottocat的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
汉堡包的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
完美世界的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
田様的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
NexusExplorer的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
无花果的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
飞鸟完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Ava的应助被醉熏的含桃采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
CipherSage的应助被tianmj采纳,获得30
7秒前
JamesPei的应助被tianmj采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
toxic发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 1000
Электротехническая система магнитожидкостной герметизации валов регулируемых электродвигателей 800
Guidelines for fracture-safe and fatigue-reliable design of steel structures 600
The Basics of Practical Optimization, Second Edition 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7984885
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9444390
关于积分的说明 21090880
捐赠科研通 7559412
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3376953
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2510911
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2410220