Implementing an Interprofessional Difficult Airway Response Team to Identify and Manage High‐Risk Airways

投掷 气道 多学科方法 气道管理 计算机科学 风险评估 医学 医疗急救 外科 计算机安全 社会科学 社会学 程序设计语言
作者
Mohammad K Shukairy,Lexia Chadwick,Cinthia M. LaPorte,Josephine Pudwill,Jennifer A. Syslo,Julie C. Fitzgerald,Carol M. Bier‐Laning
出处
期刊:Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [Wiley]
卷期号:169 (2): 422-431 被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1002/ohn.357
摘要

Abstract Objective To describe a multidisciplinary approach to and results from the creation of a difficult airway response team (DART) to address the management of inpatient loss of airway events. Methods Description of an interprofessional process to establish and sustain a DART program at a tertiary care hospital. An Institutional Review Board‐approved retrospective review of the quantitative results was conducted from November 2019 through March 2021. Results After establishing the existing processes for difficult airway management, a focus on “work as imagined” identified 4 pillars to address the goal for the project of bringing the right providers with the right equipment to the right patients at the right time through DART equipment carts, an expanded DART code team, a screening tool to identify patients with at‐risk airways and unique messaging for DART code alerts. “Work as done” was assessed through simulations. Educational efforts included further simulations and group teaching. Sustainability was achieved through ongoing e‐learning and bidirectional feedback. During the period of study, there were 40,752 patients admitted and 28,013 (69%) screens completed. At‐risk airways were identified in 4282 admissions (11%), most commonly due to a history of a difficult airway (19%) and elevated body mass index (16%). The DART responded to 126 codes. There were no airway‐related deaths or serious adverse events. Discussion A successful DART program was created, optimized, and sustained using components of interprofessional meetings, simulation, bidirectional feedback, and quantitative analysis. Implications for Practice The techniques described can serve to guide groups who identify a quality improvement project that involves interactions between multiple stakeholders.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
qlw123完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
钮祜禄如懿完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
灿烂千阳发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
CodeCraft应助奥丁蒂法采纳,获得10
1秒前
zjh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
汉堡包应助达达采纳,获得10
1秒前
Lzx完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
杨莱发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
称心蘑菇发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
费可发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
缥缈的背包完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
平常丝发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
李健应助pxl99567采纳,获得10
2秒前
VivianGao发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小王同学完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
愉快的戎完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
文虎完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
田様应助Aroma采纳,获得10
4秒前
壮壮发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
微笑以亦完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
才_浅完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6666发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
xcx完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
XYX9910完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
CipherSage应助太帥了沒辦法采纳,获得10
7秒前
哥哥完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
wei发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
巩秦黎完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
GDD完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
所所应助Leecorleone采纳,获得10
9秒前
JIAN发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
我cr完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
123456789完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Tanning Chemistry: The Science of Leather (2nd Edition) 2000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7259763
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8881667
关于积分的说明 18766935
捐赠科研通 6939870
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3201706
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375447
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2177407