Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights

质量(理念) 尊严 偏爱 人口 任务(项目管理) 医学 医疗保健 比例(比率) 家庭医学 心理学 老年学 环境卫生 统计 地理 数学 哲学 管理 认识论 地图学 政治学 法学 经济 经济增长
作者
Gang Chen,Julie Ratcliffe,Rachel Milte,Jyoti Khadka,Billingsley Kaambwa
出处
期刊:Social Science & Medicine [Elsevier]
卷期号:289: 114440-114440 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114440
摘要

The quality of aged care provided to older people is a concern for all countries globally. This study adopts a novel first-stage discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a second-stage quality rating task to empirically estimate the relative importance of six key aged care quality criteria from more than 10,000 Australian general population sample. The six attributes or characteristics (each with five levels) compose the new measure, Quality of Care Experience (QCE) in aged care that includes: 'Respect & Dignity', 'Make Own Decisions', 'Skills & Training (of staff)', 'Health & Wellbeing', 'Social Relationships', and 'Lodging Complaints'. The online survey was conducted between September and October 2019. Preference heterogeneity was evident among respondents. The latent class analysis indicates that those more experienced respondents (i.e. have a better knowledge of Australia's current aged care system or they had a close family member who was receiving aged care services) valued more towards the outcomes of the aged care services whilst the inexperienced respondents valued highly towards the process of the aged care services. A preference weighted scoring algorithm was developed for the QCE measure (on a 0–1 scale whereby 0 = lowest quality and 1 = highest quality) and the corresponding quality thresholds for 'Unacceptable/Poor', 'Satisfactory' and 'High/Very High' quality of care were reported based on the second-stage quality rating questions following each DCE task. The impact of different QCE attributes on the quality ratings was non-linear when considering movements from 'Unacceptable/Poor' to 'Satisfactory', and from 'Satisfactory' to 'High/Very High'. This study provides important insights into the general public's perceptions of the relative importance of key quality of care experience criteria in aged care.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Betty完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
chenqihua发布了新的文献求助30
1秒前
平常冬灵发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Electra完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
kunkun完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
大胆诗云完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
zoe发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
嘎嘎顺利发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
zxrzxr123完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.1应助帮抬抬采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
草履虫发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
生鱼安乐完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
思源应助chenzhi采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
shin发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
高分求助中
Entre Praga y Madrid: los contactos checoslovaco-españoles (1948-1977) 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Hope Teacher Rating Scale 600
Death Without End: Korea and the Thanatographics of War 500
Der Gleislage auf der Spur 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6090783
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7920619
关于积分的说明 16393255
捐赠科研通 5222991
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2792023
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1774823
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1649915