Rapid Supportive Response to a Traumatic “Zoombombing” During the COVID-19 Pandemic

电视会议 无礼的 执法 第一响应者 心理学 医学教育 入侵 远程医疗 医学 医疗急救 政治学 计算机科学 多媒体 工程类 医疗保健 法学 运筹学 地质学 地球化学
作者
Colin G. Walsh,Kim M. Unertl,Jon Ebert
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:96 (1): e6-e7 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000003739
摘要

To the Editor: During the COVID-19 pandemic, unprecedented numbers of academicians are working remotely and using videoconferencing for teaching, research, and collaboration. Embracing novel technology rapidly at this scale leads to security risks. With the rise of videoconferencing, virtual intruders have been interrupting meetings to display offensive audiovisual content. In April 2020, the Department of Biomedical Informatics at Vanderbilt University Medical Center suffered a traumatic videoconference intrusion ("Zoombombing") with racist imagery and video of sexual violence against minors. The offensive content affected over 70 students, staff, faculty, and industry collaborators. We coordinated a rapid response with experts in trauma-informed psychology to address the impact of this event. Given the likelihood of similar episodes occurring elsewhere, we share our staged response and prevention strategy to help others prevent such intrusions and to help those who have already been affected. The steps we outline below have prevented recurrent attacks. Immediate response. When the intrusion occurred, we ended the affected meeting as quickly as possible. Subsequently, department leaders notified law enforcement and the Tennessee Department of Children's Services. To reduce the risk of recurrence, we improved security practices and publicized these changes to educate other groups and to reassure affected attendees regarding future meetings. Specific steps included: Making passwords and waiting rooms mandatory Muting attendees on entrance Maintaining host-only audio controls Encouraging typed chat questions/comments during lectures/seminars Permitting unmuting for question-and-answer sessions (optional) First 24–48 hours: Acknowledge and normalize. After the intrusion, we publicly acknowledged via email the trauma inherent in this type of videoconference intrusion. We normalized feelings of disgust, anger, and grief as appropriate responses. Our stance included granting each other the "gift of grace," allowing space and time to acknowledge responses nonjudgmentally. Importantly, leaders' willingness to acknowledge their own reactions and coping promoted psychological safety, which contributed to a healing environment. On an individual level, we leveraged our community of faculty, staff, and trainees in our department to organize weekly peer-to-peer check-ins (10 minutes) scheduled around other existing meetings. In these check-ins, we shared available institutional resources for grounding and relaxation (e.g., mindfulness, movement classes). We reminded our teams that some people will feel they can cope on their own—also an acceptable response. Next day and subsequent week: Resilience-focused support. The following day, we reminded our community of short- and long-term supportive online and face-to-face resources available for coping and emphasized expectations of wellness and health (e.g., "As terrible as the intrusion was, we have resources to help you cope with what occurred"). One week later, we held a secure, optional, drop-in support session led by psychologists and experts in trauma-informed mental health (including J.S.E.) that was well received and well attended. We also emphasized free, confidential Employee Assistance Programs and options for longer-term personalized counseling. Long-term: Coping not closure. Via departmental email and in our drop-in support session, we acknowledged that the videoconferencing intrusion might not result in identification or arrest of the perpetrators. Similarly, the crimes depicted might have been solved years ago. In either case, our resilient community will overcome this intrusion together. Once seen, intrusive images cannot be unseen. But we might aid others who have been similarly affected and focus our energy on supporting our communities. Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Tarah Kuhn for her guidance, education, and support, including her participation in the drop-in support session described above.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
99发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助鸡狗不如采纳,获得10
2秒前
Fsy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
yyyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
赘婿应助呼呼采纳,获得10
3秒前
小Q发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
张鸿飞发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Hello应助ymh采纳,获得10
4秒前
aajhajkahna应助轻松板栗采纳,获得10
5秒前
贝贝完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
KhanhVy发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
可爱的函函应助淇微采纳,获得10
6秒前
田様应助晴天采纳,获得10
7秒前
doublenine18发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
贝贝发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
上官若男应助张鸿飞采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
Hello应助我的同桌是上校采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
科研小灵通完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
Lucas应助向前采纳,获得10
12秒前
sikh应助YAN采纳,获得10
13秒前
小羊会飞完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
Philcc发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Xee发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
renfei完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
温柔的幻巧完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
haohaohao发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
晴天发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
silence完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
20秒前
aajhajkahna应助轻松板栗采纳,获得10
20秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 500
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7771778
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9314441
关于积分的说明 20338395
捐赠科研通 7357095
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3316735
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2465322
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2331801