作者
Garrett M. Frampton,Alex Fichtenholtz,Geoff Otto,Kai Wang,Sean R. Downing,Jie He,Michael Schnall-Levin,Jared White,Eric M. Sanford,Peter An,James Sun,Frank Juhn,Kristina Brennan,Kiel Iwanik,Ashley Maillet,Jamie Buell,Emily White,Mandy Zhao,Sohail Balasubramanian,Selmira Terzic,Tina Richards,Vera Banning,Lázaro Ibrahim Romero García,Kristen Mahoney,Zac Zwirko,Amy Donahue,Himisha Beltran,Juan Miguel Mosquera,Mark A. Rubin,Snjezana Doğan,Cyrus V. Hedvat,Michael F. Berger,Lajos Pusztai,Matthias Lechner,Chris Boshoff,Mirna Jarosz,Christine Vietz,Alex Parker,Vincent A. Miller,Jeffrey S. Ross,John A. Curran,Maureen Cronin,Philip J. Stephens,Doron Lipson,Roman Yelensky
摘要
Clinical tests that rely on next-generation sequencing to evaluate large numbers of cancer genes can be validated using pooled cell lines with known mutations. As more clinically relevant cancer genes are identified, comprehensive diagnostic approaches are needed to match patients to therapies, raising the challenge of optimization and analytical validation of assays that interrogate millions of bases of cancer genomes altered by multiple mechanisms. Here we describe a test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing to characterize base substitutions, short insertions and deletions (indels), copy number alterations and selected fusions across 287 cancer-related genes from routine formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) clinical specimens. We implemented a practical validation strategy with reference samples of pooled cell lines that model key determinants of accuracy, including mutant allele frequency, indel length and amplitude of copy change. Test sensitivity achieved was 95–99% across alteration types, with high specificity (positive predictive value >99%). We confirmed accuracy using 249 FFPE cancer specimens characterized by established assays. Application of the test to 2,221 clinical cases revealed clinically actionable alterations in 76% of tumors, three times the number of actionable alterations detected by current diagnostic tests.