Cognitive and Motor Therapy After Stroke Is Not Superior to Motor and Cognitive Therapy Alone to Improve Cognitive and Motor Outcomes: New Insights From a Meta-analysis

认知 心理信息 物理医学与康复 随机对照试验 荟萃分析 医学 心理学 梅德林 物理疗法 精神科 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Elissa Embrechts,Thomas B. McGuckian,Jeffrey M. Rogers,Chris Dijkerman,Bert Steenbergen,Peter H. Wilson,Tanja C.W. Nijboer
出处
期刊:Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:104 (10): 1720-1734 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.010
摘要

To evaluate whether cognitive-and-motor therapy (CMT) is more effective than no therapy, motor therapy or cognitive therapy on motor and/or cognitive outcomes after stroke. Additionally, this study evaluates whether effects are lasting, and which CMT approach is most effective.AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, and PsycINFO databases were searched in October, 2022.Twenty-six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria: randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals since 2010, that investigated adults with stroke, delivered CMT, and included at least 1 motor, cognitive or cognitive-motor outcome. Two CMT approaches exist: CMT Dual-task ("classical" dual-task where the secondary cognitive task has a distinct goal) and CMT Integrated (where cognitive components of the task are integrated into the motor task).Data on study design, participant characteristics, interventions, outcome measures (cognitive/motor/cognitive-motor), results and statistical analysis were extracted. Multi-level random-effects meta-analysis was conducted.CMT demonstrated positive effects compared with no therapy on motor outcomes (g=0.49 [0.10, 0.88]) and cognitive-motor outcomes (g = 0.29 [0.03, 0.54]). CMT showed no significant effects compared with motor therapy on motor, cognitive and cognitive-motor outcomes. A small positive effect of CMT compared with cognitive therapy on cognitive outcomes (g=0.18 [0.01, 0.36]) was found. CMT demonstrated no follow-up effect compared with motor therapy (g=0.07 [-0.04, 0.18]). Comparison of CMT Dual-task and Integrated revealed no significant difference for motor (F1, 141=0.80, P= .371) or cognitive outcomes (F1, 72=0.61, P=.439).CMT was not superior to mono-therapies to improve outcomes after stroke. CMT approaches were equally effective suggesting that training that enlists a cognitive load per se, may benefit outcomes. (PROSPERO CRD42020193655).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
田睿完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
Akim应助诸葛烤鸭采纳,获得10
5秒前
Survive完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
uuuu完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
疲惫发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Aryatarg发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
12秒前
12秒前
诸葛烤鸭完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Anonymous完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
huluwa发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
xiaozhang完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
hdbys完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
yolo完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
清脆小蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
HHHHHH发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
19秒前
玛卡巴卡发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
药化的彦祖完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
酷小裤完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
疲惫完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
开朗的熊猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
huilll完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
灵梦柠檬酸完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
科研通AI6.2应助宇麦达采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
坚定的又莲完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
Ok发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
李健的小迷弟应助huluwa采纳,获得10
23秒前
wyb完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
11112321321完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
cscgood发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
阿黑完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
24秒前
h7nho完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
2026年中国辛酸癸酸聚乙二醇甘油酯行业市场规模及竞争格局分析报告 1000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
适配Micro-LED色转换的高兼容性量子点负性光刻胶制备与工艺研究 500
Direct and Iterative Linear System Solvers 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7312689
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8929209
关于积分的说明 18924078
捐赠科研通 6973241
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3213447
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2381597
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2191537