Comment on: Endovascular therapy versus no endovascular therapy in patients receiving best medical management for acute isolated occlusion of the posterior cerebral artery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

European Journal of NeurologyVolume 30, Issue 7 p. 2132-2134 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Comment on: Endovascular therapy versus no endovascular therapy in patients receiving best medical management for acute isolated occlusion of the posterior cerebral artery: A systematic review and meta-analysis Pengcheng Zhu, Pengcheng Zhu Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Wu, Corresponding Author Tao Wu [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-3132 Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China Correspondence Tao Wu, Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Pengcheng Zhu, Pengcheng Zhu Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Wu, Corresponding Author Tao Wu [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-0283-3132 Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China Correspondence Tao Wu, Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 25 March 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15798Citations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Berberich A, Finitsis S, Strambo D, et al. Endovascular therapy versus no endovascular therapy in patients receiving best medical management for acute isolated occlusion of the posterior cerebral artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2022; 29(9): 2664-2673. doi:10.1111/ene.15410 2Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011; 343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 3Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed April 15, 2017. 4Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52(6): 377-384. doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 Citing Literature Volume30, Issue7July 2023Pages 2132-2134 ReferencesRelatedInformation