Intereye Agreement in Dry-Eye Signs in the DREAM Study: Implications for Future Dry-Eye Trials

眼科 医学 组内相关 染色 隐形眼镜 病理 临床心理学 心理测量学
作者
Anny Zhong,Patrick Augello,Penny A. Asbell,Gui‐Shuang Ying
出处
期刊:Cornea [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:44 (2): 149-156 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1097/ico.0000000000003605
摘要

Purpose: To investigate intereye agreement in dry-eye disease (DED) signs in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management study. Methods: Tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test, conjunctival staining, corneal staining, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), and tear osmolarity were measured at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Intereye agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient, weighted kappa, and percentage of participants with absolute intereye difference (AID) exceeding a clinically significant threshold (2 points for conjunctival staining and MGD, 2 seconds for TBUT, 3 points for corneal staining, 5 mm/5 minutes for Schirmer test, and 8 mOsms/L for osmolarity). The worse eye at each visit for each DED sign was determined as the eye with a sign worse than the contralateral eye by at least the clinically significant threshold. Results: DED signs had moderate-to-good intereye agreement with intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.45 (tear osmolarity) to 0.81 (corneal staining and Schirmer test) and weighted kappa from 0.58 (plugging) to 0.69 (lid secretion). Percentage of participants exceeding threshold AID was 15% to 20% for conjunctival staining, 11% to 15% for TBUT, 17% to 21% for MGD, 13% to 18% for corneal staining, 21% to 23% for Schirmer test, and 44% to 47% for osmolarity. The eye with a worse DED sign ranged between 36% (TBUT) and 80% (osmolarity) of participants. Conclusions: Participants demonstrated moderate-to-good intereye agreement, yet a substantial portion showed clinically significant intereye differences in each sign. The worse eye was not the same eye in the majority during follow-up. These findings suggest considering signs from both eyes in future DED trials.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
慢慢完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
123完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
虾条发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
善学以致用应助yyl采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
天天快乐应助包容的映天采纳,获得10
3秒前
香菜发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
糯米发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
土豆泥发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
lex发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
Vererg完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
所所应助allrubbish采纳,获得10
4秒前
大个应助ClayJiang采纳,获得10
5秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
顺心的青梦完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
难过盼海完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
luo完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
11112321321完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
赘婿应助罗兴鲜采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
布丁完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
汝桢发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
疆之北完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
yang完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
XPDrake完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
Zx_1993应助西瓜味小黄人采纳,获得20
9秒前
idrees完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
高山完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Vertebrate Palaeontology, 5th Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5338291
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4475468
关于积分的说明 13928343
捐赠科研通 4370654
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2401391
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394507
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366346