心理干预
灵活性(工程)
忠诚
妥协
医学
干预(咨询)
临床试验
文档
护理部
计算机科学
统计
程序设计语言
社会学
病理
电信
社会科学
数学
作者
Robert D. Kerns,Alison F. Davis,Julie M. Fritz,Francis J. Keefe,Peter Peduzzi,Daniel I. Rhon,Stephanie L. Taylor,Robert D. Vining,Qilu Yu,Steven B. Zeliadt,Steven Z. George
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.008
摘要
Nonpharmacological treatments are considered first-line pain management strategies, but they remain clinically underused. For years, pain-focused pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) have generated evidence for the enhanced use of nonpharmacological interventions in routine clinical settings to help overcome implementation barriers. The Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2) framework describes the degree of pragmatism across 9 key domains. Among these, "flexibility in delivery" and "flexibility in adherence," address a key goal of pragmatic research by tailoring approaches to settings in which people receive routine care. However, to maintain scientific and ethical rigor, PCTs must ensure that flexibility features do not compromise delivery of interventions as designed, such that the results are ethically and scientifically sound. Key principles of achieving this balance include clear definitions of intervention core components, intervention monitoring and documentation that is sufficient but not overly burdensome, provider training that meets the demands of delivering an intervention in real-world settings, and use of an ethical lens to recognize and avoid potential trial futility when necessary and appropriate. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents nuances to be considered when applying the PRECIS-2 framework to describe pragmatic clinical trials. Trials must ensure that patient-centered treatment flexibility does not compromise delivery of interventions as designed, such that measurement and analysis of treatment effects is reliable.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI