医学
败血症
感染性休克
复苏
重症监护医学
早期目标导向治疗
拯救脓毒症运动
休克(循环)
随机对照试验
严重败血症
临床试验
高乳酸血症
急诊医学
外科
内科学
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ccc.2016.12.004
摘要
Between 2014 and 2015, 3 independent, multicenter, randomized controlled trials evaluated early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) in severe sepsis and septic shock: Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) from the United States; Australasian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation (ARISE), and Protocolised Management in Sepsis (ProMISe) in the United Kingdom. All 3 trials confirmed that there was no survival benefit of EGDT compared to usual resuscitation. How should we define usual care for sepsis given these study findings? Furthermore, the definition of sepsis has now been updated. This article reviews key findings of these 3 trials and discusses these important issues in sepsis management.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI