Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

医学 颈动脉内膜切除术 围手术期 冲程(发动机) 无症状的 随机对照试验 优势比 狭窄 内科学 动脉内膜切除术 颈动脉支架置入术 荟萃分析 心脏病学 外科
作者
Jie Wang,Xuesong Bai,Tao Wang,Adam A Dmytriw,Alka B Patel,L. Jiao
出处
期刊:Stroke [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.122.038994
摘要

Background: To compare safety and efficacy between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in treating asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis based on results from randomized controlled trials. Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing CAS and CEA in treating asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis were searched from databases of the EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane libraries. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies, extracted relevant data, and used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to assess quality. Mantel-Haenszel method random-effects models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) regarding perioperative risks between CAS and CEA. Kaplan-Meier curve data were extracted and analyzed through Exp[(O-E)/Var] fixed-effect models to calculate the Peto odds ratio (OR) regarding long-term outcomes. Results: Sixteen articles from 7 randomized controlled trials were included, reporting relevant outcomes for 7230 asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients (CAS: n=3920; CEA: n=3198). Compared with the CEA group, CAS group had no difference in perioperative composite end point events including stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI; OR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.87–1.47]; P =0.37, I 2 =0%). Compared with CEA, CAS had a higher risk of any stroke during the perioperative period (OR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.16–2.24]; P =0.004, I 2 =0%) and an increased risk of nondisabling stroke (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.23–2.65]; P =0.003, I 2 =0%), but there was no significant difference in disabling stroke and death between groups (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.50–1.65]; P =0.76, I 2 =0%). For long-term outcomes, no difference regarding the composite outcome of any stroke, death, and myocardial infarction existed between CEA and CAS (Peto OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.94–1.48]; P =0.14, I 2 =0%). Individual-level patient data would be important to verify the long-term outcome results. Conclusions: When treating asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, CAS has comparable perioperative and long-term composite outcomes compared with CEA. However, CAS may have a higher risk of any stroke and nondisabling stroke in the perioperative period.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
深情安青应助别喝他的酒采纳,获得10
刚刚
犀牛完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
1秒前
轻松雨旋发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
4秒前
犀牛发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
091完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Viviiviii完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
xs小仙女完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
aaa完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
冰冰完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
cloud完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
刘帅完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
neocc123完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
52pry发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
dreamode发布了新的文献求助15
13秒前
strug783发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科研通AI2S应助Viviiviii采纳,获得10
14秒前
dada完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
高兴的彩虹完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
111111应助谦让的寄凡采纳,获得10
18秒前
锌小子完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
lanxinge发布了新的文献求助20
21秒前
TYM发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
小库的咖喱完成签到,获得积分20
26秒前
28秒前
nzhou2527发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
科研通AI5应助秋子采纳,获得10
35秒前
雪sung发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
搜集达人应助疯狂的荟采纳,获得10
39秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
39秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3780310
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3325580
关于积分的说明 10223667
捐赠科研通 3040766
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668988
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798962
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758648