医学
克朗巴赫阿尔法
探索性因素分析
结构效度
检查表
心室辅助装置
比例(比率)
可靠性(半导体)
生活质量(医疗保健)
标准效度
心力衰竭
心理测量学
物理疗法
内科学
临床心理学
护理部
心理学
功率(物理)
物理
量子力学
认知心理学
作者
Naoko Kato,Semyon Melnikov,Quin E. Denfeld,Jesus Casida,Anna Strömberg,Tuvia Ben Gal,Christopher S. Lee,Tiny Jaarsma
出处
期刊:Circulation
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2022-11-08
卷期号:146 (Suppl_1)
标识
DOI:10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.10591
摘要
Introduction: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, this field has lacked valid and reliable measures to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVAD. To address this need, we recently developed the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale based on a literature review and 2-round Delphi method. Objectives: To evaluate psychometric properties of the new 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was performed in Japan, Israel, and the United States. Measurement properties of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale were evaluated in reference to the COSMIN Study Design Checklist. In the present study, construct validity, convergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were examined. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a subsample of data (n = 18) from the first and second surveys. Results: Data on 127 patients with LVAD in Israel, Japan, and the USA were analysed (mean age 51±14.3, 81% male). Approximately half had a HeartMate II (47%), while 20% had a HeartMate 3. The median time patients lived with the LVAD was 9.7 months [IQR 3.9-21.8]. Exploratory factor analysis with promax rotation extracted three factors [Factor 1: Monitoring (8 items), Factor 2: Heart failure self-care (5 items), and Factor 3: LVAD self-care (7 items)], and during the analysis 13 items were excluded from the scale. Internal consistency assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for the total scale (α=0.80) and the three subscales: Monitoring (α=0.81), Heart failure self-care (α=0.67), and LVAD self-care (α=0.63). The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale had sufficient convergent validity with the LVAD Patient Home Management Adherence Scale (r=0.47, p<0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient of the total score was 0.58, suggesting adequate test-retest reliability. Conclusions: The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale showed adequate validity and reliability. The scale is ready for use in clinical practice and research. Additional testing might further optimise the scale.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI