亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Scoping review of registration of observational studies finds inadequate registration policies, increased registration, and a debate converging towards pro-registration

观察研究 图像配准 试用登记 预注册 医学 医学物理学 计算机科学 人工智能 临床试验 医学教育 病理 图像(数学)
作者
Daniel Malmsiø,Simon Norlén,Cecilie Jespersen,Victoria Emilie Neesgaard,Zexing Song,An‐Wen Chan,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:: 111686-111686
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111686
摘要

We aimed to examine a) the policies of national and international clinical trial registries regarding observational studies; b) the time-trends of observational study registration; c) the published arguments for and against observational study registration. Scoping review of registry practices and published arguments. We searched the websites and databases of all 19 members of the World Health Organization's Registry Network to identify policies relating to observational studies and the number of observational studies registered annually from the beginning of the registries to 2022. Regarding documents with arguments, we searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and top medical and epidemiological journals from 2009 to 2023. We classified arguments as "main" based on the number (n≥3) of documents they occurred in. Of 19 registries, 15 allowed observational study registration, of which seven (35%) had an explicit policy regarding what to register and two (11%) about when to register. The annual number of observational study registrations increased over time in all registries, e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov increased from 313 in 1999 to 9,775 in 2022. Fifty documents provided arguments concerning observational study registration: 31 argued for, 18 against, and one was neutral. Since 2012, 19 out of 25 documents argued for. We classified nine arguments as main: five for and four against. The two most prevalent arguments for were the prevention of selective reporting of outcomes (n=16) and publication bias (n=12), and against were that it will hinder exploration of new ideas (n=17) and it will waste resources (n=6). Few registries have policies regarding observational studies; an increasing number of observational studies were registered; there was a lively debate on the merits of registration of observational studies, which, since 2012, seems to converge towards pro-registration.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
17秒前
17秒前
无心的月光完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
haralee完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
41秒前
pete发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
51秒前
大个应助pete采纳,获得10
56秒前
1分钟前
赘婿应助我不爱吃红苹果采纳,获得10
1分钟前
真实的荣轩完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
跳跃雨寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
yannnis完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
pete发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
yannnis发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
落后安青完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
爆米花应助pete采纳,获得10
2分钟前
2分钟前
石龙子完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
闪闪的水彤完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
酷酷的雨完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
pete发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
何妨倒置完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
领导范儿应助pete采纳,获得10
4分钟前
闪闪访波完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
5分钟前
bkagyin应助11采纳,获得10
5分钟前
5分钟前
pete发布了新的文献求助10
5分钟前
汉堡包应助pete采纳,获得10
5分钟前
冷酷的冰枫完成签到,获得积分10
5分钟前
CodeCraft应助movoandy采纳,获得10
6分钟前
humorlife完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
现代的冰海完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
高分求助中
Psychopathic Traits and Quality of Prison Life 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6451246
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8263209
关于积分的说明 17606217
捐赠科研通 5516005
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2903573
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880627
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1722625