亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Scoping review of registration of observational studies finds inadequate registration policies, increased registration, and a debate converging towards pro-registration

观察研究 图像配准 试用登记 预注册 医学 医学物理学 计算机科学 人工智能 临床试验 医学教育 病理 图像(数学)
作者
Daniel Malmsiø,Simon Norlén,Cecilie Jespersen,Victoria Emilie Neesgaard,Zexing Song,An‐Wen Chan,Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Epidemiology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:: 111686-111686
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111686
摘要

We aimed to examine a) the policies of national and international clinical trial registries regarding observational studies; b) the time-trends of observational study registration; c) the published arguments for and against observational study registration. Scoping review of registry practices and published arguments. We searched the websites and databases of all 19 members of the World Health Organization's Registry Network to identify policies relating to observational studies and the number of observational studies registered annually from the beginning of the registries to 2022. Regarding documents with arguments, we searched Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and top medical and epidemiological journals from 2009 to 2023. We classified arguments as "main" based on the number (n≥3) of documents they occurred in. Of 19 registries, 15 allowed observational study registration, of which seven (35%) had an explicit policy regarding what to register and two (11%) about when to register. The annual number of observational study registrations increased over time in all registries, e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov increased from 313 in 1999 to 9,775 in 2022. Fifty documents provided arguments concerning observational study registration: 31 argued for, 18 against, and one was neutral. Since 2012, 19 out of 25 documents argued for. We classified nine arguments as main: five for and four against. The two most prevalent arguments for were the prevention of selective reporting of outcomes (n=16) and publication bias (n=12), and against were that it will hinder exploration of new ideas (n=17) and it will waste resources (n=6). Few registries have policies regarding observational studies; an increasing number of observational studies were registered; there was a lively debate on the merits of registration of observational studies, which, since 2012, seems to converge towards pro-registration.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
眼睛大的莫英完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
小乔应助邱蔓莉采纳,获得20
2秒前
6秒前
丸子完成签到 ,获得积分0
10秒前
yangzai完成签到 ,获得积分0
13秒前
paperx发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
王者归来完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
paperx完成签到,获得积分20
18秒前
RSU完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
千秋岁发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
初雪完成签到,获得积分0
28秒前
深情安青应助paperx采纳,获得10
30秒前
silence完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
电量过低完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
wanci应助ttrgy采纳,获得10
38秒前
46秒前
48秒前
51秒前
高亦凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
52秒前
52秒前
fxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
ttrgy发布了新的文献求助10
59秒前
小乔应助邱蔓莉采纳,获得20
1分钟前
mmyhn应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
千秋岁完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
mmyhn应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
mmyhn应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1分钟前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
fxy关注了科研通微信公众号
1分钟前
健忘的姝发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
平淡惋清完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
土豆你个西红柿完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
啦啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
2分钟前
zc完成签到,获得积分10
2分钟前
一枝杷枇发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
yihualister关注了科研通微信公众号
2分钟前
2分钟前
郭长银完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Psychopathic Traits and Quality of Prison Life 1000
Development Across Adulthood 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6451142
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8263153
关于积分的说明 17605858
捐赠科研通 5515929
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2903547
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880587
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1722600