医学
安慰剂
氮芥
嗜睡
鼻喷雾剂
人口
鼻孔
过敏
随机对照试验
内科学
麻醉
鼻腔给药
不利影响
鼻子
外科
免疫学
替代医学
环境卫生
病理
作者
Jean Bousquet,Ludger Klimek,Hans-Christian Kuhl,Duc Tung Nguyen,Rajesh Kumar Ramalingam,G. Walter Canonica,William E. Berger
摘要
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects up to 40% of the pediatric population. The US practice parameter recommends the use of INAH or INCS as first-line therapy for the treatment of AR. Although not directly targeted to children, the recent US Practice Parameters proposed intranasal antihistamines as first-line therapy whereas the ARIA guidelines did not. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study with a duration of 28 days. It compared Azelastine hydrochloride 0.10% and 0.15% to placebo of one spray per nostril twice daily in pediatric subjects with moderate-to-severe symptomatic perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Results: A total of 486 subjects were included in the study. The change from baseline rTNSS was statistically significant for 0.15% AZE (P = .005) and 0.10% AZE (P = .015) vs. placebo. 0.15% AZE showed an LS mean change of -3.45 (20.2%) over the 28-day treatment period from a baseline value of 16.60 in rTNSS. 0.10% AZE showed an LS mean change of -3.37 (20.5%) over the 28-day treatment period from a baseline value of 16.35 in rTNSS. Somnolence was reported by one patient in the 0.1% group and one placebo patient (both of mild severity and unlikely to be related to treatment). None of the patients reported fatigue. Conclusions: 0.15% AZE significantly improved the overall rTNSS compared with placebo over the 28-day study period. 0.15% AZE was well tolerated in this study.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI