Development and Validation of an Instrument Measuring Self-Care in Persons With a Fecal Ostomy

克朗巴赫阿尔法 结构效度 验证性因素分析 可靠性(半导体) 医学 物理疗法 考试(生物学) 心理测量学 心理学 临床心理学 结构方程建模 统计 量子力学 生物 数学 物理 古生物学 功率(物理)
作者
Eladio Collado‐Boira,Francisco Herrero Machancoses,Maria Dolores Temprado-Albalat
出处
期刊:Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:45 (4): 335-340 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1097/won.0000000000000444
摘要

The purpose of this study was to describe development of the Specific Self-Care for Ostomized Patients Questionnaire (CAESPO) instrument and evaluate its construct validity, internal reliability, and test-retest reliability (temporal stability).Prospective evaluation of psychometric properties of the instrument.The study sample comprised 125 persons (n = 89, 71.2% men) with a temporary (n = 42, 33.6%) and permanent (n = 83, 66.4%) colostomy (n = 102, 81.6%) and ileostomy (n = 23, 18.4%). Their mean age was 66.72 years; all had undergone ostomy surgery at least 3 months prior to study participation. Participants were drawn from 4 acute care facilities in the province of Castellon, Spain.The CAESPO Questionnaire is completed by a nurse or health care provider. It comprises 3 sections: the first queries sociodemographic data, the second queries pertinent clinical data, and the third contains 58 scored items with 4 ordinal responses. Possible cumulative scores ranged from 58 to 232 points; scores are reported based on a derived percentage score that varies from 0 to 100, where a score of 0 indicates lower self-care and 100 indicates a high level of self-care.Data were collected at baseline and retesting was completed 6 months later. Internal consistency of the CAESPO was evaluated using the Cronbach α coefficient; temporal stability (test-retest reliability) was evaluated using the test-retest procedure; confirmatory factor analysis based on conceptually hypothesized factor structure was performed to evaluate construct validity.Initial assessment of the construct validity of the CAESPO using confirmatory factory analysis revealed a poor fit, resulting in removal of multiple items from each of the subscales owing to low-factor loading values. The final model comprised 58 scored items; it was found to have a good fit based on standard indices (χ= 43.132, P < .001; root mean square error of approximation = 0.155 [0.107-0.204]; Bentler-Bonett normed fit index = 0.957; comparative fit index = 0.967; incremental fit index = 0.968), indicating adequate construct validity. The internal consistency of the CAESPO total score was acceptable at α = 0.889. Test-retest reliability (temporal stability) was deemed excellent (α = 0.987).Psychometric tests indicate that the CAESPO is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring self-care in persons living with a fecal ostomy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wsz发布了新的文献求助20
刚刚
1秒前
wg发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
凯撒的归凯撒完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
顾矜应助cxt采纳,获得10
2秒前
yasi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
周VV应助格林采纳,获得20
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
summer夏发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
xiaobian发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
芳芳发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
阿氏之光发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
10秒前
容易发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
袁翰将军完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
孙禾04发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
chengyue9939完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
CodeCraft应助sunshine采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
Aha发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
中央戏精学院完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
慕容博发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
田様应助石籽采纳,获得10
17秒前
cxt发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
周燕燕发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
21秒前
llmin完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
22秒前
芳芳完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
23秒前
xiaobian完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Stereoelectronic Effects 1000
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 840
Acylated delphinidin glucosides and flavonols from Clitoria ternatea 800
Nanosuspensions 500
Византийско-аланские отно- шения (VI–XII вв.) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4189584
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3725361
关于积分的说明 11737218
捐赠科研通 3402245
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1866866
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 923684
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 834683