奇纳
多样性(控制论)
主题分析
构造(python库)
系统回顾
管理科学
心理学
工程伦理学
社会学
知识管理
计算机科学
定性研究
梅德林
政治学
工程类
社会科学
人工智能
程序设计语言
法学
精神科
心理干预
出处
期刊:Nurse Researcher
[Royal College of Nursing]
日期:2019-02-07
卷期号:27 (1): 17-21
被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.7748/nr.2019.e1616
摘要
For novice Q methodology researchers, the development of the concourse is challenging. This challenge is exacerbated by the paucity of literature focusing on the development of the concourse.To highlight the lack of strategy related to concourse development in Q methodology literature and to undertake a selected literature review to suggest frameworks for concourse development to guide researchers.A limited search conducted using CINAHL PLUS appraised the variety of concourse strategies used in Q studies. Of 44 papers located, 23 used no strategy while the others used one of four types of strategy: thematic, profession-specific, broader healthcare and social care frameworks or a framework that the researchers devised specifically for their research.The Q methodology literature frequently lacks discussion about the development of the concourse. Therefore, studies that focus on concourse development should be a focus of future research, along with the further development of the ideas put forward in this paper for possible frameworks.This paper will raise awareness inside and outside the Q methodology community that novice researchers want to use Q methodology but may require more detail about how to construct robust concourses.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI