Does Simulation‐Based Training Improve Procedural Skills of Beginners in Interventional Cardiology?—A Stratified Randomized Study

Objective To assess whether mentored simulation‐based‐training can improve the procedural skills of beginners in coronary interventional procedures. Background Simulation based‐catheter training is a valuable tool to practice interventional procedures. Whether this type of training enhances the procedural skills of fellows learning percutaneous coronary interventions has never been studied. Methods Eighteen cardiology fellows were randomized either into the simulation‐based training (n = 9) or the control group (n = 9). The simulation group received 7.5 hours of virtual reality (VR) simulation training, whereas the control group attended 4.5 hours of lectures. Each participant had to perform a simple (pre‐evaluation) and a more complex (post‐evaluation) catheter intervention on a pulsatile coronary flow model in a catheterization laboratory. All procedures were videotaped, analyzed, and rated by 3 expert interventionalists, who were blinded to the randomization. To assess the individual performance level, a “skills score” was determined, comprising 14 performance characteristics (5‐level Likert scale, maximum score of 70 points). Results The “skills score” increased by 5.8 ± 6.1 points in the VR simulation group and decreased by 6.7 ± 8.4 in the control group (P = 0.003) from the simple stenosis at pre‐ to the more complex lesion at post‐evaluation demonstrating the effectiveness of simulation‐based training. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that curriculum‐based mentored VR simulation training improves the performance level of cardiology fellows in coronary interventions. Further investigation to evaluate the effect on clinical outcomes is warranted. (J Interven Cardiol 2016;29:75–82)