医学
偏头痛
荟萃分析
替代医学
比较有效性研究
系统回顾
梅德林
重症监护医学
家庭医学
物理疗法
精神科
内科学
病理
政治学
法学
作者
Johanna AAG Damen,Bada Yang,Demy L. Idema,Robin W.M. Vernooij,Linde F. Huis in ‘t Veld,Mike P.T. Kusters,René Spijker,Kim van der Braak,Pauline Heus,Kevin Jenniskens,Lotty Hooft
标识
DOI:10.7326/annals-24-00315
摘要
Various treatments for preventing episodic migraine are available. To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and harms of pharmacologic prevention of episodic migraine, focusing on treatments already determined to be superior to placebo. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until April 2024. Randomized trials evaluating selected efficacious pharmacologic treatments in adults with episodic migraine. Selection was done independently by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and checked by a second. Risk of bias and certainty of the evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, respectively. Sixty-one studies (20 680 patients) evaluating 16 treatments were included. Nineteen studies had low risk of bias. All selected treatments were deemed efficacious against placebo on the basis of previous systematic reviews. In network meta-analyses, calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAbs) probably resulted in fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than topiramate (risk difference, -16.2% [95% CI, -18.4% to -12.8%]; moderate-certainty evidence), and CGRP-mAbs may result in less migraine-related disability and improved quality of life compared with gepants (mean differences, -4.12 [CI, -9.30 to 1.05] and 2.25 [CI, -0.85 to 5.34], respectively; low-certainty evidence). For other outcomes and comparisons, there was moderate- or low-certainty evidence of no clinically important differences, uncertain evidence, or no evidence. Limited literature was available to determine the minimal important differences. The number of head-to-head comparisons of treatments was limited. No high-certainty evidence favored one pharmacologic treatment for prevention of episodic migraine over another. Evidence was mostly insufficient or of low certainty. American College of Physicians. (PROSPERO: CRD42023414305).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI