医学
心包穿刺术
卫生棉条
心房颤动
外科
导管
心脏压塞
导管消融
围手术期
心包积液
达比加群
麻醉
心脏病学
华法林
作者
Xiliang Zhao,Wenli Dai,Xian-Jun Su,Jiahui Wu,Chongqi Jia,Liang Feng,Man Ning,Yanfei Ruan,Song Zuo,Roumu Hu,Xinru Du,J Z Dong,C S
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2023-01-24
卷期号:51 (1): 45-50
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20220923-00743
摘要
Objective: To investigate the timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of the anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) suffered from perioperative pericardial tamponade during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation and uninterrupted dabigatran. Methods: A total of 20 patients with pericardial tamponade, who underwent AF catheter ablation with uninterrupted dabigatran in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from January 2019 to August 2021, were included in this retrospective analysis. The clinical characteristics of enrolled patients, information of catheter ablation procedures, pericardial tamponade management, perioperative complications, the timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of anticoagulation were analyzed. Results: All patients underwent pericardiocentesis and pericardial effusion drainage was successful in all patients. The average drainage volume was (427.8±527.4) ml. Seven cases were treated with idarucizumab, of which 1 patient received surgical repair. The average timing of pericardial drainage catheter removal and restart of anticoagulation in 19 patients without surgical repair was (1.4±0.7) and (0.8±0.4) days, respectively. No new bleeding, embolism and death were reported during hospitalization and within 30 days following hospital discharge. Time of removal of pericardial drainage catheter, restart of anticoagulation and hospital stay were similar between patients treated with idarucizumab or not. Conclusion: It is safe and reasonable to remove pericardial drainage catheter and restart anticoagulation as soon as possible during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with uninterrupted dabigatran independent of the idarucizumab use or not in case of confirmed hemostasis.目的: 探讨心房颤动(房颤)患者导管消融围术期应用不间断口服达比加群酯期间出现心包压塞,穿刺引流后引流管拔除与重启抗凝的时机。 方法: 本研究为回顾性研究,纳入北京安贞医院2019年1月至2021年8月间接受房颤导管消融,围术期应用不间断达比加群酯抗凝期间出现心包压塞的患者共20例。收集患者临床基线资料,导管消融、心包压塞与处理参数,引流管拔除、重启抗凝时间以及围术期并发症等情况。 结果: 所有患者均顺利行心包穿刺、引流,平均引流量为(427.8±527.4)ml;7例予依达赛珠单抗治疗,其中1例行外科开胸修补术。19例未开胸患者术后拔管时间为(1.4±0.7)d,重启抗凝时间为(0.8±0.4)d;无论是否应用依达赛珠单抗,拔管时间、重启抗凝时间以及住院时间差异无统计学意义。所有患者住院期间及出院后30 d内未发生再出血、栓塞及死亡等严重并发症。 结论: 房颤导管消融围术期应用不间断达比加群酯抗凝期间发生心包压塞时,一旦止血确切,无论是否应用特异性拮抗剂,尽早拔管与重启抗凝安全、合理。.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI