供应链
供应链风险管理
脆弱性(计算)
业务
服务管理
供应链管理
弹性(材料科学)
现存分类群
临界性
风险分析(工程)
战略式采购
业务连续性
产业组织
计算机科学
营销
战略规划
计算机安全
物理
战略财务管理
核物理学
热力学
生物
进化生物学
作者
Christopher W. Craighead,Jennifer Blackhurst,Manus Rungtusanatham,Robert Handfield
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x
摘要
ABSTRACT Supply chain disruptions and the associated operational and financial risks represent the most pressing concern facing firms that compete in today's global marketplace. Extant research has not only confirmed the costly nature of supply chain disruptions but has also contributed relevant insights on such related issues as supply chain risks, vulnerability, resilience, and continuity. In this conceptual note, we focus on a relatively unexplored issue, asking and answering the question of how and why one supply chain disruption would be more severe than another. In doing so, we argue, de facto, that supply chain disruptions are unavoidable and, as a consequence, that all supply chains are inherently risky. Employing a multiple‐method, multiple‐source empirical research design, we derive novel insights, presented as six propositions that relate the severity of supply chain disruptions (i) to the three supply chain design characteristics of density, complexity, and node criticality and (ii) to the two supply chain mitigation capabilities of recovery and warning. These findings not only augment existing knowledge related to supply chain risk, vulnerability, resilience, and business continuity planning but also call into question the wisdom of pursuing such practices as supply base reduction, global sourcing, and sourcing from supply clusters.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI