医学
色谱法
外部质量评估
医学实验室
白蛋白
罗氏诊断公司
内科学
化学
病理
作者
Rui Wu,Huijuan Zhou,Xiaerbanu Nizhamnuding,Anqi Pan,Hao Zheng,Jiangtao Zhang,Haijian Zhao,Jing Wang,Tianjiao Zhang,Chuanbao Zhang
标识
DOI:10.1515/cclm-2025-0507
摘要
Abstract Objectives In clinical practice, glycated albumin (GA), as a key biomarker reflecting the level of blood glucose control in the short and medium term, has been widely used in the diagnosis and efficacy monitoring of diabetes. However, the consistency of GA results between different detection systems remains one of the current challenges in laboratory medicine. we evaluated the commutability of 10 evaluated samples to identify candidate EQA materials for GA measurement. Methods According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document EP14-A3 and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) commutability evaluation program, we used the established isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) method for serum glycated albumin determination as the comparative method, and six different commercial kits used enzyme assay as the evaluating method. A total of 40 clinical sample serums, 9 pregnancy sample serums, and 10 evaluated samples were analyzed. Results For the CLSI approach, pooled serum samples (cRM1-3) at medium concentrations (cRM2) are commutable in 5/6 kits. For the IFCC approach, none of samples commutable. Conclusions The commutability evaluation results of the two approaches were different, and the cRM2 has commutability in most enzymatic kits. It can be a commutable material for the EQA project.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI