Single-arm meta-analysis of drug response in placebo-controlled versus active-controlled antipsychotic drug trials in schizophrenia

安慰剂 抗精神病药 中止 医学 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 内科学 精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 精神科 病理 替代医学
作者
Shimeng Dong,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Spyridon Siafis,Natalie Peter,Stefan Leucht
出处
期刊:European Neuropsychopharmacology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:84: 21-26
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.04.007
摘要

Antipsychotic drug efficacy may vary in placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. The study aims to investigate the performance of antipsychotics in these two different study designs using single-arm meta-analysis. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing second-generation antipsychotics with placebo or other antipsychotics from our previous systematic reviews and updated the results with the search on Cochrane Schizophrenia Group register until March 06, 2022. The outcomes were the differences in the change of overall, positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and the difference in study discontinuation between placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials. Random-effects single-arm meta-analysis and subgroup test were conducted to examine the differences in each outcome. A total of 208 RCTs (n = 42,159) were included in the analysis. Of these, 85 trials with 17,056 participants were placebo-controlled, while the remaining were head-to-head trials. Antipsychotics in head-to-head trials demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in overall symptoms (MC −23.58; 95 % CI −25.33, −21.83) compared to antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials (MC −16.74; 95 % CI −17.80, −15.69; p < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed for positive symptoms, negative symptoms, study discontinuation and sensitivity analyses. Notably, when assessing antipsychotics individually, the same antipsychotic consistently demonstrated superior performance in head-to-head trials compared to placebo-controlled trials. In conclusion, antipsychotics in head-to-head trials presented a considerable efficacy superiority compared to those in placebo-controlled trials. Moreover, the efficacy of the same antipsychotics varied depending on the study design. Future trials should carefully consider the methodology and employ strategies to mitigate the potential for overestimation or underestimation of treatment efficacy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
隐形曼青应助leo采纳,获得10
1秒前
PhDLi完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
风趣的以筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
杨晴发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ya发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
完美世界应助xcc采纳,获得30
2秒前
董良嘉完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
8RUENCE完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
万念完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Shang完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
昭zhao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Smile23发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
m123完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
小二郎应助董良嘉采纳,获得30
8秒前
布里田完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
今后应助我来何忧采纳,获得10
9秒前
暮烟完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
蓝莓小蛋糕完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
卡比兽mini完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Hello应助小星星采纳,获得10
12秒前
2hi完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
autotrophs-ping完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
快乐灵薇发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
xcc发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
Astoria完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
mark2021完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Coraline完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
庄暖晨发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
向阳而生应助wer采纳,获得10
16秒前
312发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
传奇3应助wowo采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Chemistry, 5th Edition 1000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7371384
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8978971
关于积分的说明 19089343
捐赠科研通 7013353
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3225063
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2388685
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2205764