Single-arm meta-analysis of drug response in placebo-controlled versus active-controlled antipsychotic drug trials in schizophrenia

安慰剂 抗精神病药 中止 医学 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 临床试验 内科学 精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 精神科 病理 替代医学
作者
Shimeng Dong,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Spyridon Siafis,Natalie Peter,Stefan Leucht
出处
期刊:European Neuropsychopharmacology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:84: 21-26
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.04.007
摘要

Antipsychotic drug efficacy may vary in placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. The study aims to investigate the performance of antipsychotics in these two different study designs using single-arm meta-analysis. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing second-generation antipsychotics with placebo or other antipsychotics from our previous systematic reviews and updated the results with the search on Cochrane Schizophrenia Group register until March 06, 2022. The outcomes were the differences in the change of overall, positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and the difference in study discontinuation between placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials. Random-effects single-arm meta-analysis and subgroup test were conducted to examine the differences in each outcome. A total of 208 RCTs (n = 42,159) were included in the analysis. Of these, 85 trials with 17,056 participants were placebo-controlled, while the remaining were head-to-head trials. Antipsychotics in head-to-head trials demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in overall symptoms (MC −23.58; 95 % CI −25.33, −21.83) compared to antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials (MC −16.74; 95 % CI −17.80, −15.69; p < 0.0001). Similar findings were observed for positive symptoms, negative symptoms, study discontinuation and sensitivity analyses. Notably, when assessing antipsychotics individually, the same antipsychotic consistently demonstrated superior performance in head-to-head trials compared to placebo-controlled trials. In conclusion, antipsychotics in head-to-head trials presented a considerable efficacy superiority compared to those in placebo-controlled trials. Moreover, the efficacy of the same antipsychotics varied depending on the study design. Future trials should carefully consider the methodology and employ strategies to mitigate the potential for overestimation or underestimation of treatment efficacy.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Esther发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
瑾玉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
聪明机器猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
初七完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
沙洲完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
明亮尔蓝应助乐邦詹士采纳,获得10
2秒前
liuzhuohao应助Atlantis采纳,获得10
3秒前
平凡的七月完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
陈建完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
程君发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
张必雨完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
曹翔豪发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
张必雨发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
piupiu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
ddd发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
兴奋谷秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
eth完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
wanci应助lagom采纳,获得10
12秒前
Akim应助程君采纳,获得10
12秒前
尹天扬完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
巨大的小侠完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
garrick完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
洛希极限发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
微笑发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
威武雅容完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
大米关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
18秒前
小安完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
cdercder应助直率雪曼采纳,获得10
18秒前
Dorian完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Aurora1011完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Chemistry, 5th Edition 1000
Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Vol. 4, Thermal and Infrared Testing (IR), 4th ed 800
作者名:Kristopher P. Plain,悉尼大学的,目前只能查到其四篇论文,想找到其博士论文 590
Évora na Idade Média 555
Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7371337
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8978910
关于积分的说明 19089073
捐赠科研通 7013324
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3225034
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2388669
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2205734