A randomized controlled trial of cutting balloons versus conventional angioplasty in arteriovenous fistula stenosis

医学 随机对照试验 外科 狭窄 动静脉瘘 放射性武器 血管成形术 血栓形成 瘘管 放射科 血管造影 切割气球 闭塞 耐火材料(行星科学) 前瞻性队列研究 气球 血管疾病 血管内治疗 临床试验
作者
Ricardo Portiolli Franco,Miguel C. Riella,Domingos Candiota Chula,Márcia Tokunaga de Alcântara,Rodrigo Peixoto Campos,Thyago Proença de Moraes,Hugo Abensur
出处
期刊:Journal of Vascular Access [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:27 (3): 1105-1112 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1177/11297298251375507
摘要

Introduction: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis but frequently develop stenosis, requiring repeated endovascular interventions. Cutting balloon angioplasty (CBA) is a potential alternative to conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (cPTA), though supporting evidence remains limited. Methods: Single-center randomized controlled trial comparing CBA and cPTA for AVF stenosis. Outcomes included primary and secondary patency at 6 and 12 months, radiological success, and complications. Results: Among 190 patients randomized (CBA: n = 89; cPTA: n = 101), primary patency at 6 and 12 months showed no significant difference (CBA: 78.6%, 56.1%; cPTA: 72.2%, 51.8%; p = 0.53 and p = 0.65). Secondary patency at 12 months was higher in the CBA group (93.9% vs. 78.2%; p = 0.02), with a lower risk of loss by Cox regression (HR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14–0.91; p = 0.031). Radiological success favored CBA (84.7% vs. 76.1%; p = 0.025). Access loss due to thrombosis was significantly lower in the CBA group (2.3% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.022), though overall thrombosis rates did not differ. The leading cause of non-salvageability in both groups was an unsatisfactory outcome in the preceding angioplasty (CBA: 2/4; cPTA: 6/11). No significant differences in patency outcomes were observed in subgroup analysis by access type, stenosis location, and excluding patients with prior interventions. Minor complications occurred in 10.3% of procedures, with no major events reported. Conclusion: CBA and cPTA showed similar primary patency, but CBA led to better secondary patency and radiological success. The survival advantage may be associated with better radiological results, leading to fewer resistant stenoses and unsalvageable thrombosis cases. Further prospective trials are warranted to define role of cutting balloons in different clinical scenarios, especially in recurrent or resistant stenoses.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
瞿寒发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.2应助承一采纳,获得10
2秒前
在水一方应助承一采纳,获得10
2秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助承一采纳,获得10
2秒前
zho应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
小蘑菇应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
zho应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助承一采纳,获得10
3秒前
和平使命应助ALLDA采纳,获得10
4秒前
顺心囧发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
科研通AI2S应助Ying采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
萱萱发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
科研通AI6.2应助纷飞采纳,获得10
7秒前
可靠的柜子完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
memedaaaah发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8R60d8应助sss采纳,获得10
8秒前
cwp发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
赘婿应助Tracy采纳,获得10
9秒前
stitch完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助123采纳,获得10
11秒前
可靠白安发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
舒适向珊完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
疾风发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
CipherSage应助A宇采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
虚拟的落雁完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
釉小皮发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Reading and Understanding Health Research 500
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
Dynamische Polarisation von H-1 und B-11 in (CH-3)-3NBH-3 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7251827
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8874283
关于积分的说明 18731408
捐赠科研通 6931697
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3199529
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2374331
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2174074