艾司洛尔
医学
麻醉
血流动力学
心动过速
安慰剂
感染性休克
随机对照试验
心率
休克(循环)
心脏病学
去甲肾上腺素
临床终点
血流动力学反应
敌手
生理盐水
重症监护
心输出量
舒张期
动静脉氧分压差
作者
Michael N. Cocchi,James Dargin,Maureen Chase,Parth V. Patel,Anne Grossestreuer,Lakshman Balaji,Xiaowen Liu,Ari Moskowitz,Katherine Berg,Michael W. Donnino
出处
期刊:Shock
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2022-01-20
卷期号:57 (4): 508-517
被引量:30
标识
DOI:10.1097/shk.0000000000001905
摘要
ABSTRACT Introduction: Septic shock is often characterized by tachycardia and a hyperdynamic hemodynamic profile. Use of the beta antagonist esmolol has been proposed as a therapy to lower heart rate, thereby improving diastolic filling time and improving cardiac output, resulting in a reduction in vasopressor support. Methods: We conducted a two-center, open-label, randomized, Phase II trial comparing esmolol to placebo in septic shock patients with tachycardia. The primary endpoint was improvement in hemodynamics as measured by the difference in norepinephrine equivalent dose (NED) between groups at 6 hours after initiation of study drug. Secondary outcomes included assessing differences in inflammatory biomarkers and oxygen consumption (VO 2 ). Results: A total of 1,122 patients were assessed for eligibility and met inclusion criteria; 42 underwent randomization, and 40 received study interventions (18 in the esmolol arm and 22 in the usual care arm). The mean NED at 6 h was 0.30 ± 0.17 mcg/kg/min in the esmolol arm compared to 0.21 ± 0.19 in the standard care arm ( P = 0.15). There was no difference in number of shock free days between the esmolol (2, IQR 0, 5) and control groups (2.5, IQR 0, 6) ( P = 0.32). There were lower levels of C-reactive protein at 12 and 24 h in the esmolol arm, as well as a statistically significant difference in trend over time between groups. There were no differences in terms of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and TNFα. Among a subset who underwent VO 2 monitoring, there was decreased oxygen consumption in the esmolol patients; the mean difference between groups at 24 h was −2.07 mL/kg/min (95% CI −3.82, −0.31) ( P = 0.02), with a significant difference for the trend over time ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: Among patients with septic shock, infusion of esmolol did not improve vasopressor requirements or time to shock reversal. Esmolol was associated with decreased levels of C-reactive protein over 24 h. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Registered February 24, 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02369900
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI