| 标题 |
The cross-lagged panel model almost always provides evidence for causal effects
|
| 网址 |
求助人暂未提供
|
| DOI |
暂未提供，该求助的时间将会延长，查看原因？
|
| 其它 |
The cross-lagged panel model is a widely used tool for testing causal effects in longitudinal data. Critiques of this model have focused on the fact that it fails to account for unobserved confounders, which can lead to spurious evidence for causal effects. Prior simulation studies suggest that the risk of spurious effects is high. In this paper, randomly selected pairs of variables that showed cross-sectional correlations between .20 and .70 in a large longitudinal study were analyzed using the cross-lagged-panel-model. Results showed that in 98% of these randomly selected pairs, evidence for significant causal effects emerged. The median effect size of these randomly selected effects was larger than the median effect from the literature. Alternative models that account for stable-trait or state variance led to fewer significant effects. |
| 求助人 | |
| 下载 | 求助已完成，仅限求助人或该文件上传人下载。 |
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除
(2025-6-4)
林狗
神勇映雁
amorfati
GingerF
逍遥
秋风
Literature
YifanWang
cdercder
学术文献互助
嘻嘻哈哈
OK
sml
badr
DIVINEDC
渡人舟
斯文的白玉
Nole
qwer189
Criminology34
皖公网安备34019202002308
