作者
H.-P. Yu,Jinfeng Wang,Shu Wang,Yun Wang,Gang Tang,Yue Sun,Zeng Yin-ming,Cheng Wei
摘要
BACKGROUND Neuraxial anaesthesia is considered a routine method of reducing labour pain. Over the past few decades, several improvements in neuraxial labour analgesia have been studied and evaluated. OBJECTIVE This trial compared the analgesic effects and adverse effects between double dural puncture epidural (DDPE) and epidural for labour analgesia, and analysed the feasibility and safety of using DDPE for labour analgesia. DESIGN A single-centre, prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. SETTING Huai’an First People's Hospital, affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, from June 2023 to March 2024. PATIENTS One hundred and twenty primipara were randomised to the epidural group or the DDPE group. INTERVENTION The DDPE group underwent two needle punctures of the dura/arachnoid membranes with a 25-gauge Whitacre needle introduced via the epidural needle: one cephalad and one caudad. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with adequate analgesia (VAS pain score ≤ 30 mm) 10 min after the neuraxial block (T1). Secondary outcome measures included block quality, adverse effects and maternal outcomes. RESULTS DDPE had a higher percentage of adequate analgesia than epidural at T1 (75.0 vs. 40.0%, P < 0.001) and at T3 (98.3 vs. 85.0%, P = 0.017). Compared with epidural, lower DDPE pain VAS scores were also observed at T1 and T4: 26 [20 to 34.5] vs. 48 [26 to 59.5], P < 0.001; and 36.5 [29 to 48.5] vs. 44.5 [30 to 59.8], P = 0.01, respectively. In addition, compared with epidural, DDPE showed a faster onset of sacral coverage, 9 [8 to 13.5] vs. 16 [12 to 18] min, P < 0.001; less need for additional analgesia, 8.3 vs. 25%, P = 0.014; and lower drug consumption, 70 [50 to 90] vs. 80 [60 to 110] ml, P = 0.005. Under the conditions of this study, there was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the DDPE and epidural groups ( P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with the epidural technique, DDPE showed significant advantages for the onset of labour analgesia and demonstrated good efficacy in sacral coverage, which may improve the quality of the neuraxial block and better meet the demand for rapid analgesia in labouring women. In terms of future research directions, comparative studies between DDPE and a single dural puncture epidural, and between DDPE and combined spinal epidural are areas worthy of further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2300072727) https://www.chictr.org.cn.