卡车
重型的
中国
环境科学
职责
自然资源经济学
业务
废物管理
工程类
汽车工程
经济
政治学
法学
作者
Xizhao Zhang,Zhenhong Lin,Han Hao,Huarui Xu,Zhi Chao Wang,Shunxi Li
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104206
摘要
Heavy-duty trucks, as important players in pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, need to undertake critical responsibility in road freight. By estimating the well-to-wheel emissions and total cost of ownership for internal combustion engine heavy-duty trucks, this study proposes the model of carbon-abatement benefit to conducting an environment-economic comparison of traditional diesel and potential alternative fuel. The results show that liquefied natural gas has better economic performance, with a cost 14.9% lower than diesel, and biodiesel reduces greenhouse gas emissions by more than 40% compared to diesel. Compared to other alternative fuels, liquefied natural gas has better carbon reduction benefits, with a carbon abatement value of 0.51 CNY/km. By 2040, all alternative fuels have positive carbon abatement values, ranging from 0.26 to 1.28 CNY/km. The progress of replacing diesel by alternative fuels for heavy duty trucks depending on the incentive policies, the clean production of fuels, and the competition from electric trucks.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI