步伐
奖学金
计算机科学
医疗保健
领域(数学)
概念框架
管理科学
数据科学
工程伦理学
知识管理
社会学
工程类
政治学
社会科学
法学
数学
大地测量学
纯数学
地理
作者
Adam Cheng,Walter Eppich,Aaron W. Calhoun,Michaela Kolbe,David Kessler,Ryan Brydges,Janice C. Palaganas,Marc Auerbach,Gabriel Reedy
标识
DOI:10.1097/sih.0000000000000876
摘要
Summary Statement The evidence base supporting the adoption of simulation in health care has not kept pace with the rapid growth of the field. Although there is a growing body of research in health care simulation, many published studies describe small-scaled, underpowered projects with insufficient methodological rigor to inform our understanding of simulation. This problem is indicative of a larger challenge: the lack of focused, cohesive programs of research designed to advance the science of simulation. The METRICS framework is a model of scholarship that categorizes scholarship into 7 intersecting domains: Metascholarship, Evaluation, Translation, Research, Innovation, Conceptual, and Synthesis. In this article, we aim to explore how the METRICS framework can serve as a roadmap for researchers to develop cohesive simulation research programs. We also describe how the METRICS framework applies to existing institutional and network-based programs of health care simulation research and discuss future implications for the global health care simulation community.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI