Different impacts of hedonic and utilitarian personal Internet usage behaviour on well‐being and work engagement: A daily examination

Abstract Past research suggests that personal Internet usage (PIU) at work can carry both costs and benefits for employees, but offers no explanation for these mixed results. In this research, we argue that the competing findings might be due to the existence of different types of PIU. We take a daily approach and propose that hedonic PIU (HPIU, i.e. relaxing oneself) benefits employees' end‐of‐workday well‐being and work engagement while utilitarian PIU (UPIU, i.e. solving others' problems) hinders their well‐being and work engagement. We test our theorizing using three studies. In Study 1, we summarized previous PIU studies and relied on machine learning methods to classify the 618 PIU activities identified in prior studies. We found that prior research mixed HPIU and UPIU and might reach different conclusions. In Study 2, we condensed the PIU activity list in Study 1 and developed measurement scales of HPIU and UPIU. In Study 3, we analysed 1063 multi‐wave daily inputs from 125 employees and found that on a daily basis, HPIU benefits employees' well‐being by fostering a state of recovery, while UPIU impedes well‐being and work engagement by inducing a state of depletion. Moreover, supervisor support for employees' personal behaviours strengthens the beneficial effect of HPIU.